{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW","short_pith_number":"pith:SKKUQ5RO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"929548762e67c46244ada560fab3144581bdaf5673ce9294e8fe6ba3b6c75a4e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2206.11104","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Chirag Agarwal, Dan Ley, Eshika Saxena, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Isha Puri, Marinka Zitnik, Martin Pawelczyk, Nari Johnson, Satyapriya Krishna","submitted_at":"2022-06-22T14:01:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"While several types of post hoc explanation methods have been proposed in recent literature, there is very little work on systematically benchmarking these methods. Here, we introduce OpenXAI, a comprehensive and extensible open-source framework for evaluating and benchmarking post hoc explanation methods. OpenXAI comprises of the following key components: (i) a flexible synthetic data generator and a collection of diverse real-world datasets, pre-trained models, and state-of-the-art feature attribution methods, and (ii) open-source implementations of eleven quantitative metrics for evaluating"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2206.11104","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2022-06-22T14:01:34Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"0a8154067dabb369157e6f9ec3e12c5d835d80fdefbfa4b267d1628e899b96cb","abstract_canon_sha256":"3104ed467f11bf2379e43996c8094169a8c1b114847b7f4091c3cf5b96c20828"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:55:43.818134Z","signature_b64":"UJOaCRCeHc7JCSbc7Ha1bwe+rVncWT4YGyQXJTvh852pM3iWD9DsxSgQvmeNEqa0IQUiFMLj7zxtAHQedW/BBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"929548762e67c46244ada560fab3144581bdaf5673ce9294e8fe6ba3b6c75a4e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:55:43.817583Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:55:43.817583Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"OpenXAI: Towards a Transparent Evaluation of Model Explanations","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Chirag Agarwal, Dan Ley, Eshika Saxena, Himabindu Lakkaraju, Isha Puri, Marinka Zitnik, Martin Pawelczyk, Nari Johnson, Satyapriya Krishna","submitted_at":"2022-06-22T14:01:34Z","abstract_excerpt":"While several types of post hoc explanation methods have been proposed in recent literature, there is very little work on systematically benchmarking these methods. Here, we introduce OpenXAI, a comprehensive and extensible open-source framework for evaluating and benchmarking post hoc explanation methods. OpenXAI comprises of the following key components: (i) a flexible synthetic data generator and a collection of diverse real-world datasets, pre-trained models, and state-of-the-art feature attribution methods, and (ii) open-source implementations of eleven quantitative metrics for evaluating"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2206.11104","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2206.11104/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2206.11104","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:55:43.817644+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2206.11104v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:55:43.817644+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2206.11104","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:55:43.817644+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SKKUQ5ROM7CG","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:55:43.817644+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFN","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:55:43.817644+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SKKUQ5RO","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:55:43.817644+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.03014","citing_title":"xai_evals : A Framework for Evaluating Post-Hoc Local Explanation Methods","ref_index":9,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SKKUQ5RO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SKKUQ5RO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2206.11104&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SKKUQ5ROM7CGERFNUVQPVMYUIW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:55:43.817644+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:55:43.817644+00:00"}