{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL","short_pith_number":"pith:SKNCZPOK","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"929a2cbdcad8944252cd5fef7484352afbe9e8cd5ecd4bab204de94af020a08a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2302.10208","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Reflected entropy is not a correlation measure","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["quant-ph"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Jonathan Sorce, Marius Lemm, Patrick Hayden","submitted_at":"2023-02-20T19:00:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"By explicit counterexample, we show that the \"reflected entropy\" defined by Dutta and Faulkner is not monotonically decreasing under partial trace, and so is not a measure of physical correlations. In fact, our counterexamples show that none of the R\\'enyi reflected entropies $S_{R}^{(\\alpha)}$ for $0 < \\alpha < 2$ is a correlation measure; the usual reflected entropy is realized as the $\\alpha=1$ member of this family. The counterexamples are given by quantum states that correspond to classical probability distributions, so reflected entropy fails to measure correlations even at the classical"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2302.10208","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-th","submitted_at":"2023-02-20T19:00:02Z","cross_cats_sorted":["quant-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"4a5c89ca7a53007c77f4a2fdc708d73912a9fdeaadf86bb4d9412df99de10f3a","abstract_canon_sha256":"0f6b79badf410eb481188da62a43508e8682113b036715296643aeeb80ec153b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:20.656798Z","signature_b64":"jNGJnLo/IfTVPNwklPnzIR4z9k6oL/RGzmHls6+iGKi4WDGhtBzwFKa45ie8fR9CY17/esJLLWE7LR+5Sd7XCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"929a2cbdcad8944252cd5fef7484352afbe9e8cd5ecd4bab204de94af020a08a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:20.656256Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:20.656256Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Reflected entropy is not a correlation measure","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["quant-ph"],"primary_cat":"hep-th","authors_text":"Jonathan Sorce, Marius Lemm, Patrick Hayden","submitted_at":"2023-02-20T19:00:02Z","abstract_excerpt":"By explicit counterexample, we show that the \"reflected entropy\" defined by Dutta and Faulkner is not monotonically decreasing under partial trace, and so is not a measure of physical correlations. In fact, our counterexamples show that none of the R\\'enyi reflected entropies $S_{R}^{(\\alpha)}$ for $0 < \\alpha < 2$ is a correlation measure; the usual reflected entropy is realized as the $\\alpha=1$ member of this family. The counterexamples are given by quantum states that correspond to classical probability distributions, so reflected entropy fails to measure correlations even at the classical"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2302.10208","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2302.10208/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2302.10208","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:20.656335+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2302.10208v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:20.656335+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2302.10208","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:20.656335+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SKNCZPOK3CKE","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:20.656335+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWN","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:20.656335+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SKNCZPOK","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:20.656335+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.21081","citing_title":"The Entanglement Wedge Polygon","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.00593","citing_title":"Genuine multientropy, dihedral invariants and Lifshitz theory","ref_index":82,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SKNCZPOK"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SKNCZPOK","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2302.10208&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SKNCZPOK3CKEEUWNL7XXJBBVFL/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:20.656335+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:18:20.656335+00:00"}