{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2010:SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD","short_pith_number":"pith:SLFAZIJN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"92ca0ca12d3fb59ccd351b95f8cc25b8cd0bb600e536a7a33a31987af1d3d2e0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1008.4884","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"The Standard Model effective theory contains 59 independent dimension-six operators once redundancies are removed under baryon conservation.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"B. Grzadkowski, J. Rosiek, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak","submitted_at":"2010-08-28T19:19:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"When the Standard Model is considered as an effective low-energy theory, higher dimensional interaction terms appear in the Lagrangian. Dimension-six terms have been enumerated in the classical article by Buchmueller and Wyler [3]. Although redundance of some of those operators has been already noted in the literature, no updated complete list has been published to date. Here we perform their classification once again from the outset. Assuming baryon number conservation, we find 15 + 19 + 25 = 59 independent operators (barring flavour structure and Hermitian conjugations), as compared to 16 + "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1008.4884","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2010-08-28T19:19:07Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2480df77ddaf4f8a02537450c05f04f0cb64dea6d9b59a1618b0f8159bbef0c6","abstract_canon_sha256":"a7e02642b09aebcb20b43a90c1159941092e4816db399786e7d626c6d23ab8d5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:25:27.083960Z","signature_b64":"LjZBGwsQgkT4U8pyvMQxdBkqrOTh3IQah8hCQfJQRXENplwTtP6C2GeZIr0otIusRyqxHSXJe7A3QCaXjMKdCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"92ca0ca12d3fb59ccd351b95f8cc25b8cd0bb600e536a7a33a31987af1d3d2e0","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:25:27.083482Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:25:27.083482Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Dimension-Six Terms in the Standard Model Lagrangian","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"The Standard Model effective theory contains 59 independent dimension-six operators once redundancies are removed under baryon conservation.","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"B. Grzadkowski, J. Rosiek, M. Iskrzynski, M. Misiak","submitted_at":"2010-08-28T19:19:07Z","abstract_excerpt":"When the Standard Model is considered as an effective low-energy theory, higher dimensional interaction terms appear in the Lagrangian. Dimension-six terms have been enumerated in the classical article by Buchmueller and Wyler [3]. Although redundance of some of those operators has been already noted in the literature, no updated complete list has been published to date. Here we perform their classification once again from the outset. Assuming baryon number conservation, we find 15 + 19 + 25 = 59 independent operators (barring flavour structure and Hermitian conjugations), as compared to 16 + "},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"Assuming baryon number conservation, we find 15 + 19 + 25 = 59 independent operators (barring flavour structure and Hermitian conjugations), as compared to 16 + 35 + 29 = 80 in Ref.[3].","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That baryon number is exactly conserved and that every redundancy has been correctly removed by the chosen field redefinitions and equations of motion.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Re-enumeration of dimension-six SM operators yields 59 independent terms (15+19+25) when baryon number is conserved, versus 80 previously.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"The Standard Model effective theory contains 59 independent dimension-six operators once redundancies are removed under baryon conservation.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"ec23c395dd9d6c64d2ac3242abec78268d695f974b87540e21acbe3ab7bbcd0f"},"source":{"id":"1008.4884","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":"1341bdba-d51a-4c83-bc02-bf743445ae9b","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-14T00:07:54.221147Z","strongest_claim":"Assuming baryon number conservation, we find 15 + 19 + 25 = 59 independent operators (barring flavour structure and Hermitian conjugations), as compared to 16 + 35 + 29 = 80 in Ref.[3].","one_line_summary":"Re-enumeration of dimension-six SM operators yields 59 independent terms (15+19+25) when baryon number is conserved, versus 80 previously.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That baryon number is exactly conserved and that every redundancy has been correctly removed by the chosen field redefinitions and equations of motion.","pith_extraction_headline":"The Standard Model effective theory contains 59 independent dimension-six operators once redundancies are removed under baryon conservation."},"references":{"count":35,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":2010,"title":"Nakamura et al","work_id":"ba1546eb-e2b5-443c-b69d-4e85dd92252b","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1975,"title":"T. Appelquist and J. Carazzone, Phys. Rev. D 11 (1975) 2856","work_id":"8303911f-9dc4-44d7-8eb1-7fd52e2aa55b","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1986,"title":"W. Buchmüller and D. Wyler, Nucl. Phys. B 268 (1986) 621","work_id":"1294136b-ba20-4a33-96a0-e26d3da71179","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1980,"title":"H. D. Politzer, Nucl. Phys. B 172 (1980) 349","work_id":"eb3e3e93-892b-48f3-b762-0ead701c4d76","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1975,"title":"H. Kluberg-Stern and J. B. Zuber, Phys. Rev. D 12 (1975) 3159","work_id":"545bc155-ed94-417a-ab6f-72a62f146825","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":35,"snapshot_sha256":"69508ef6f0a0f99d3b9da3962aed5f659c37d939d690b97b01e916d19edcdcbb","internal_anchors":10},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":1,"snapshot_sha256":"df7065c029e5a48e281547b57ebf71fd14003052b416c5f260ca4e2568321bb7"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1008.4884","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:25:27.083567+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1008.4884v3","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:25:27.083567+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1008.4884","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:25:27.083567+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SLFAZIJNH62Z","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:13.927090+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:13.927090+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SLFAZIJN","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:13.927090+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":63,"internal_anchor_count":63,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1906.10631","citing_title":"Towards global fits in EFT's and New Physics implications","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"1906.11332","citing_title":"VBSCan Thessaloniki 2018 Workshop Summary","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"1906.12310","citing_title":"Proposal for the validation of Monte Carlo implementations of the standard model effective field theory","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"1907.00416","citing_title":"Combined explanation of the B-anomalies","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23759","citing_title":"Correlated $b \\to s$ and $s \\to d$ Rare Semileptonic Transitions in the Standard Model Effective Field Theory","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"1907.07605","citing_title":"Complete One-Loop Renormalization of the Higgs-Electroweak Chiral Lagrangian","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2204.00564","citing_title":"Reach and complementarity of $\\mu\\to e$ searches","ref_index":57,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2408.07255","citing_title":"Dihadron azimuthal asymmetry and light-quark dipole moments at the Electron-Ion Collider","ref_index":7,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2411.00096","citing_title":"Why detect forward muons at a muon collider","ref_index":90,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.07651","citing_title":"An EWPD SMEFT likelihood for the LHC -- and how to improve it with measurements of W and Z boson properties","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.18540","citing_title":"Higgs Decays to $Z\\gamma$ and $\\gamma\\gamma$ in the Flavor-Gauged Two Higgs Doublet Model","ref_index":60,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2412.14253","citing_title":"From the EFT to the UV: the complete SMEFT one-loop dictionary","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.02958","citing_title":"Combined effective field theory interpretation of Higgs boson, electroweak vector boson, top quark, and multi-jet measurements","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.12855","citing_title":"Amplitudes and partial wave unitarity bounds","ref_index":58,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.13081","citing_title":"Combination and interpretation of differential Higgs boson production cross sections in proton-proton collisions at $\\sqrt{s}$ = 13 TeV","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21594","citing_title":"Exploring the SMEFT landscape: Bayesian Model Selection for indirect discovery","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.21721","citing_title":"The Higgs-top-$Z$ mass coincidence relation after NNLO matching","ref_index":15,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.02032","citing_title":"Neural simulation-based inference of the Higgs trilinear self-coupling via off-shell Higgs production","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.07585","citing_title":"Particle Collisions & Quantum Entanglement in High-Energy Collisions","ref_index":115,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.04517","citing_title":"Constraining the four-light quark operators in the SMEFT with multijet and VBF processes at linear level","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2005.01515","citing_title":"The Dark Photon","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.18382","citing_title":"Probing SMEFT Operators through $t\\bar{t}t\\bar{t}$ Production with Hyper-Graph Neural Networks at the LHC","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.18679","citing_title":"NLO EW and QCD dimension-6 SMEFT results for Higgs and gauge boson decays in POPxf format","ref_index":3,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.19016","citing_title":"Measurements of the Higgs boson production, fiducial and differential cross-sections in the four lepton decay channel using 164 fb$^{-1}$ of data collected at $\\sqrt{s}$ = 13.6 TeV with the ATLAS dete","ref_index":137,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.15267","citing_title":"Hierarchies from Higher Flavor Spin","ref_index":60,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":1,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SLFAZIJN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SLFAZIJN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1008.4884&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SLFAZIJNH62ZZTJVDOK7RTBFXD/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:25:27.083567+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:25:27.083567+00:00"}