{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2014:SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP","short_pith_number":"pith:SPGORM2D","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"93cce8b343314a78443d2f263f7fb20bd3939f437592af9487efa0aa5ef5331c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1410.1441","version":8},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Fidelity of recovery, geometric squashed entanglement, and measurement recoverability","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IT","math-ph","math.IT","math.MP"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Kaushik P. Seshadreesan, Mark M. Wilde","submitted_at":"2014-10-06T16:26:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper defines the fidelity of recovery of a quantum state on systems $A$, $B$, and $C$ as a measure of how well one can recover the full state on all three systems if system $A$ is lost and a recovery operation is performed on system $C$ alone. The surprisal of the fidelity of recovery (its negative logarithm) is an information quantity which obeys nearly all of the properties of the conditional quantum mutual information $I(A;B|C)$, including non-negativity, monotonicity with respect to local operations, duality, invariance with respect to local isometries, a dimension bound, and continu"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1410.1441","kind":"arxiv","version":8},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2014-10-06T16:26:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.IT","math-ph","math.IT","math.MP"],"title_canon_sha256":"e4669f3b4718069b904bbc76d9111784312ef4d72f285504078679b9f9ca027c","abstract_canon_sha256":"f4052e135c9dfa536600cf1e177a741201aa4001379fdfe0f07fbcaa5b160e0f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T01:26:25.574712Z","signature_b64":"pc07Cxf2CYbP2lH5+LHa5hGMI65bRvc9SLp7RnLvuYgfIc3m7bOZ/F1bMZrNZPfVViCGtekavOZjRJWAa4U3Aw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"93cce8b343314a78443d2f263f7fb20bd3939f437592af9487efa0aa5ef5331c","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T01:26:25.574213Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T01:26:25.574213Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Fidelity of recovery, geometric squashed entanglement, and measurement recoverability","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.IT","math-ph","math.IT","math.MP"],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Kaushik P. Seshadreesan, Mark M. Wilde","submitted_at":"2014-10-06T16:26:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper defines the fidelity of recovery of a quantum state on systems $A$, $B$, and $C$ as a measure of how well one can recover the full state on all three systems if system $A$ is lost and a recovery operation is performed on system $C$ alone. The surprisal of the fidelity of recovery (its negative logarithm) is an information quantity which obeys nearly all of the properties of the conditional quantum mutual information $I(A;B|C)$, including non-negativity, monotonicity with respect to local operations, duality, invariance with respect to local isometries, a dimension bound, and continu"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1410.1441","kind":"arxiv","version":8},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1410.1441","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:26:25.574297+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1410.1441v8","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:26:25.574297+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1410.1441","created_at":"2026-05-18T01:26:25.574297+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SPGORM2DGFFH","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:49.207871+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:49.207871+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SPGORM2D","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:49.207871+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"1905.08762","citing_title":"The entropy of bulk quantum fields and the entanglement wedge of an evaporating black hole","ref_index":53,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SPGORM2D"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SPGORM2D","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1410.1441&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SPGORM2DGFFHQRB5F4TD675SBP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T01:26:25.574297+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T01:26:25.574297+00:00"}