{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU","short_pith_number":"pith:SPMTE5V7","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"93d93276bf0325eb91666569248490750e30f5add2dc166c4a63c85ed7ef889c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1903.00047","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical $\\beta$-decay rates resolved from first principles","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"nucl-th","authors_text":"A. Schwenk, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, J. D. Holt, K. A. Wendt, P. Gysbers, P. Navratil, S. Quaglioni, S. R. Stroberg, T. D. Morris, T. Papenbrock","submitted_at":"2019-02-28T19:57:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"$\\beta$-decay, a process that changes a neutron into a proton (and vice versa), is the dominant decay mode of atomic nuclei. This decay offers a unique window to physics beyond the standard model, and is at the heart of microphysical processes in stellar explosions and the synthesis of the elements in the Universe. For 50 years, a central puzzle has been that observed $\\beta$-decay rates are systematically smaller than theoretical predictions. This was attributed to an apparent quenching of the fundamental coupling constant $g_A \\simeq $ 1.27 in the nucleus by a factor of about 0.75 compared t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1903.00047","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"nucl-th","submitted_at":"2019-02-28T19:57:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"d2e8c38bd4de867b641c5202455e265b90ff0e9b61bcf69c25bee841fe06487c","abstract_canon_sha256":"464f3351a46c8fac1e6a9bc5727cd275863148dd4264faede83bd6f0a6b94279"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:24.048554Z","signature_b64":"B7gW4OCoAxMc36VNyxLFSutbyHG/wLsvAdmCFoiQHg5SNQqRg858PyyW3ga650kKHHtcd7jfyxebWB03+5PPDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"93d93276bf0325eb91666569248490750e30f5add2dc166c4a63c85ed7ef889c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:24.048023Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:24.048023Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Discrepancy between experimental and theoretical $\\beta$-decay rates resolved from first principles","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"nucl-th","authors_text":"A. Schwenk, G. Hagen, G. R. Jansen, J. D. Holt, K. A. Wendt, P. Gysbers, P. Navratil, S. Quaglioni, S. R. Stroberg, T. D. Morris, T. Papenbrock","submitted_at":"2019-02-28T19:57:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"$\\beta$-decay, a process that changes a neutron into a proton (and vice versa), is the dominant decay mode of atomic nuclei. This decay offers a unique window to physics beyond the standard model, and is at the heart of microphysical processes in stellar explosions and the synthesis of the elements in the Universe. For 50 years, a central puzzle has been that observed $\\beta$-decay rates are systematically smaller than theoretical predictions. This was attributed to an apparent quenching of the fundamental coupling constant $g_A \\simeq $ 1.27 in the nucleus by a factor of about 0.75 compared t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1903.00047","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1903.00047/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1903.00047","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:24.048103+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1903.00047v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:24.048103+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1903.00047","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:24.048103+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SPMTE5V7AMS6","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:24.048103+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SPMTE5V7AMS6XELG","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:24.048103+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SPMTE5V7","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:24.048103+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.26926","citing_title":"Challenging chiral EFT with tritium beta decay","ref_index":11,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28488","citing_title":"Dark energy from neutrino interactions in Unimodular Gravity","ref_index":82,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SPMTE5V7"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SPMTE5V7","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1903.00047&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SPMTE5V7AMS6XELGMVUSJBEQOU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:24.048103+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:24.048103+00:00"}