{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC","short_pith_number":"pith:SR3B45T2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"94761e767a53f22044d021dbf8f40b5099482967028160b0cbf7c5f99ce97255","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2402.09540","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Why Does Differential Privacy with Large Epsilon Defend Against Practical Membership Inference Attacks?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Andrew Lowy, Jing Liu, Kieran Parsons, Toshiaki Koike-Akino, Ye Wang, Zhuohang Li","submitted_at":"2024-02-14T19:31:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"For small privacy parameter $\\epsilon$, $\\epsilon$-differential privacy (DP) provides a strong worst-case guarantee that no membership inference attack (MIA) can succeed at determining whether a person's data was used to train a machine learning model. The guarantee of DP is worst-case because: a) it holds even if the attacker already knows the records of all but one person in the data set; and b) it holds uniformly over all data sets. In practical applications, such a worst-case guarantee may be overkill: practical attackers may lack exact knowledge of (nearly all of) the private data, and ou"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2402.09540","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2024-02-14T19:31:45Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"title_canon_sha256":"6cf673b61e9c7774c0f04724c1ac29662c612b3fdc5cc300cbb1edec7b4bb7b6","abstract_canon_sha256":"1ddfec9e94728564509b0253394b343227fb05b8e5e6e725e4754e5dd05bc393"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:17.884083Z","signature_b64":"iAy1S5NcYnOR58DWml/GYQNeGeIQGBYT/NyYiUkjvVDoe2KBSEczfuIbyVLDayePSbautTpM1pcl7/RJxkqrDw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"94761e767a53f22044d021dbf8f40b5099482967028160b0cbf7c5f99ce97255","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:17.883666Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:17.883666Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Why Does Differential Privacy with Large Epsilon Defend Against Practical Membership Inference Attacks?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.LG"],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Andrew Lowy, Jing Liu, Kieran Parsons, Toshiaki Koike-Akino, Ye Wang, Zhuohang Li","submitted_at":"2024-02-14T19:31:45Z","abstract_excerpt":"For small privacy parameter $\\epsilon$, $\\epsilon$-differential privacy (DP) provides a strong worst-case guarantee that no membership inference attack (MIA) can succeed at determining whether a person's data was used to train a machine learning model. The guarantee of DP is worst-case because: a) it holds even if the attacker already knows the records of all but one person in the data set; and b) it holds uniformly over all data sets. In practical applications, such a worst-case guarantee may be overkill: practical attackers may lack exact knowledge of (nearly all of) the private data, and ou"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2402.09540","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2402.09540/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2402.09540","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:17.883728+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2402.09540v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:17.883728+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2402.09540","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:17.883728+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SR3B45T2KPZC","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:17.883728+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SR3B45T2KPZCARGQ","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:17.883728+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SR3B45T2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:17.883728+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.07471","citing_title":"Where to Intervene? Benchmarking Fairness-Aware Learning on Differentially Private Synthetic Tabular Data","ref_index":43,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.06835","citing_title":"On Privacy Leakage in Tabular Diffusion Models: Influential Factors, Attacker Knowledge, and Metrics","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SR3B45T2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SR3B45T2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2402.09540&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SR3B45T2KPZCARGQEHN7R5ALKC/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:17.883728+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:45:17.883728+00:00"}