{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575","short_pith_number":"pith:SRAJSQPV","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"94409941f55adf7c36b8466a2e43fdff706dec0e2ca84e5ff5293c2b7bfe3808","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2407.02840","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Boltzmann Bridges","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"cond-mat.stat-mech","authors_text":"Carlo Rovelli, David Wolpert, Jordan Scharnhorst","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T06:37:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is often stated that the second law of thermodynamics follows from the condition that at some given time in the past the entropy was lower than it is now. Formally, this condition is the statement that $E[S(t)|S(t_0)]$, the expected entropy of the universe at the current time $t$ conditioned on its value $S(t_0)$ at a time $t_0$ in the past, is an increasing function of $t $. We point out that in general this is incorrect. The epistemic axioms underlying probability theory say that we should condition expectations on all that we know, and on nothing that we do not know. Arguably, we know th"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2407.02840","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cond-mat.stat-mech","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T06:37:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":["physics.hist-ph"],"title_canon_sha256":"037e5d20bb0ff5069dcf003bce729651d144ea39829de1a2b16423bf34f4551e","abstract_canon_sha256":"ec35e82946534f0050210ccda6f18070dca4f708332a8c4112c61268e50da71e"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:55.269709Z","signature_b64":"kIIB524a+YIzRG3vdRmH0IxUlcz3ZSQeQ4SlaelMmvBlZy6ZSht4dV8MGTY9ZD/GaSWcZj2tuUTWKYGDmVdHAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"94409941f55adf7c36b8466a2e43fdff706dec0e2ca84e5ff5293c2b7bfe3808","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:55.269257Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:55.269257Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Boltzmann Bridges","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["physics.hist-ph"],"primary_cat":"cond-mat.stat-mech","authors_text":"Carlo Rovelli, David Wolpert, Jordan Scharnhorst","submitted_at":"2024-07-03T06:37:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is often stated that the second law of thermodynamics follows from the condition that at some given time in the past the entropy was lower than it is now. Formally, this condition is the statement that $E[S(t)|S(t_0)]$, the expected entropy of the universe at the current time $t$ conditioned on its value $S(t_0)$ at a time $t_0$ in the past, is an increasing function of $t $. We point out that in general this is incorrect. The epistemic axioms underlying probability theory say that we should condition expectations on all that we know, and on nothing that we do not know. Arguably, we know th"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2407.02840","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2407.02840/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2407.02840","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:55.269325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2407.02840v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:55.269325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.02840","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:55.269325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SRAJSQPVLLPX","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:55.269325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVY","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:55.269325+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SRAJSQPV","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:55.269325+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.25260","citing_title":"Closed Quantum Boltzmann Bridges: Coherent Revivals, Hidden Microstates, and the Emergence of Classical Two-Time Entropy Conditioning","ref_index":18,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.13922","citing_title":"Decoherence, Perturbations and Symmetry in Lindblad Dynamics -- Implications for Diffractive Dissociation","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SRAJSQPV"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SRAJSQPV","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2407.02840&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SRAJSQPVLLPXYNVYIZVC4Q7575/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:55.269325+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:52:55.269325+00:00"}