{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ","short_pith_number":"pith:STPINAMR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"94de868191eddf6cfd7d0141b66a157e674918c6d009b7e11d75333baf08e8e9","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.16940","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Reasoning Does Not Necessarily Improve Role-Playing Ability","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Lingpeng Kong, Longxu Dou, Xiachong Feng","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T08:08:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"The application of role-playing large language models (LLMs) is rapidly expanding in both academic and commercial domains, driving an increasing demand for high-precision role-playing models. Simultaneously, the rapid advancement of reasoning techniques has continuously pushed the performance boundaries of LLMs. This intersection of practical role-playing demands and evolving reasoning capabilities raises an important research question: \"Can reasoning techniques enhance the role-playing capabilities of LLMs?\" To address this, we conduct a comprehensive study using 6 role-playing benchmarks, 24"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.16940","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T08:08:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"70fdff5d3db50f5a7cfbdd7618a57065d8d1bcbfd955d18bacdd7ff9d5f6ba77","abstract_canon_sha256":"aa240e5222f0f4cd73ef4e632b03847d17a7af50f24da772cd92a954576397b6"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:52.425869Z","signature_b64":"/3fRKMTbumqP8UYpIIXuSuzt3U7MgP4prYb/S5Urkvuy2V7DdNahHO5fAOQ85ttyC7xeKIkiREzIbVUAIw8CAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"94de868191eddf6cfd7d0141b66a157e674918c6d009b7e11d75333baf08e8e9","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:52.425282Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:52.425282Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Reasoning Does Not Necessarily Improve Role-Playing Ability","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Lingpeng Kong, Longxu Dou, Xiachong Feng","submitted_at":"2025-02-24T08:08:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"The application of role-playing large language models (LLMs) is rapidly expanding in both academic and commercial domains, driving an increasing demand for high-precision role-playing models. Simultaneously, the rapid advancement of reasoning techniques has continuously pushed the performance boundaries of LLMs. This intersection of practical role-playing demands and evolving reasoning capabilities raises an important research question: \"Can reasoning techniques enhance the role-playing capabilities of LLMs?\" To address this, we conduct a comprehensive study using 6 role-playing benchmarks, 24"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.16940","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.16940/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.16940","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:52.425385+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.16940v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:52.425385+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.16940","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:52.425385+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"STPINAMR5XPW","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:52.425385+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:52.425385+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"STPINAMR","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:52.425385+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2504.10368","citing_title":"Exploring the System 1 Thinking Capability of Large Reasoning Models","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.09756","citing_title":"MOA: Multi-Objective Alignment for Role-Playing Agents","ref_index":1,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.09567","citing_title":"Towards Reasoning Era: A Survey of Long Chain-of-Thought for Reasoning Large Language Models","ref_index":184,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/STPINAMR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/STPINAMR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.16940&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/STPINAMR5XPWZ7L5AFA3M2QVPZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:52.425385+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:40:52.425385+00:00"}