{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2020:SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7","short_pith_number":"pith:SUALEANU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9500b201b4a716bbc8e5d82069585957f38ad031e8e6f8f1aa59ff87d1e82623","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2005.02359","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Data","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CV","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Liron Bergman, Yedid Hoshen","submitted_at":"2020-05-05T17:44:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Anomaly detection, finding patterns that substantially deviate from those seen previously, is one of the fundamental problems of artificial intelligence. Recently, classification-based methods were shown to achieve superior results on this task. In this work, we present a unifying view and propose an open-set method, GOAD, to relax current generalization assumptions. Furthermore, we extend the applicability of transformation-based methods to non-image data using random affine transformations. Our method is shown to obtain state-of-the-art accuracy and is applicable to broad data types. The str"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2005.02359","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2020-05-05T17:44:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CV","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"b6f4ba9c34291144c7a6a96992b5f2fdc803c52fab4f68abb99a2e4b5f74d4b5","abstract_canon_sha256":"ed455f7d983e3f97ccea4be09615483b1d1272f81e06f373fca1e54efca20d15"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:25.156933Z","signature_b64":"LBt07dows9YQfP6cYHpcHojMuq8/J1hSI8Zd5K5iRYAXjAzLRa61lTDZYyuCyBjgryYE6r81A8WucOJ/uE8VAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9500b201b4a716bbc8e5d82069585957f38ad031e8e6f8f1aa59ff87d1e82623","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:25.156424Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:25.156424Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Classification-Based Anomaly Detection for General Data","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CV","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Liron Bergman, Yedid Hoshen","submitted_at":"2020-05-05T17:44:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Anomaly detection, finding patterns that substantially deviate from those seen previously, is one of the fundamental problems of artificial intelligence. Recently, classification-based methods were shown to achieve superior results on this task. In this work, we present a unifying view and propose an open-set method, GOAD, to relax current generalization assumptions. Furthermore, we extend the applicability of transformation-based methods to non-image data using random affine transformations. Our method is shown to obtain state-of-the-art accuracy and is applicable to broad data types. The str"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2005.02359","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2005.02359/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2005.02359","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:25.156500+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2005.02359v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:25.156500+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2005.02359","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:25.156500+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SUALEANUU4LL","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:25.156500+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SUALEANUU4LLXSHF","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:25.156500+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SUALEANU","created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:25.156500+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.01300","citing_title":"ChronosAD: Leveraging Time Series Foundation Models for Accurate Anomaly Detection","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28970","citing_title":"RGLD: Randomized Global-Local Density Estimation for Tabular Anomaly Detection","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23231","citing_title":"Beyond Normal References: Discriminative Few-Shot Anomaly Detection","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.06810","citing_title":"Calibrating Tabular Anomaly Detection via Optimal Transport","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.08202","citing_title":"Beyond Penalization: Diffusion-based Out-of-Distribution Detection and Selective Regularization in Offline Reinforcement Learning","ref_index":52,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.10242","citing_title":"When Normality Shifts: Risk-Aware Test-Time Adaptation for Unsupervised Tabular Anomaly Detection","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SUALEANU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SUALEANU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2005.02359&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SUALEANUU4LLXSHF3AQGSWCZK7/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:25.156500+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T01:00:25.156500+00:00"}