{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ","short_pith_number":"pith:SVVPVM5M","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"956afab3ac96476d9061cadaca2638641e311a769c6aec3a80e148be35b01ac0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2309.12987","version":4},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Relating Wigner's Friend Scenarios to Nonclassical Causal Compatibility, Monogamy Relations, and Fine Tuning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Andrea Di Biagio, David Schmid, Elie Wolfe, Eric Gama Cavalcanti, Marina Maciel Ansanelli, Y\\`il\\`e Y\\=ing","submitted_at":"2023-09-22T16:32:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Nonclassical causal modeling was developed in order to explain violations of Bell inequalities while adhering to relativistic causal structure and faithfulness -- that is, avoiding fine-tuned causal explanations. Recently, a no-go theorem that can be viewed as being stronger than Bell's theorem has been derived, based on extensions of the Wigner's friend thought experiment: the Local Friendliness (LF) no-go theorem. Here we show that the LF no-go theorem poses formidable challenges for the field of causal modeling, even when nonclassical and/or cyclic causal explanations are considered. We fir"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2309.12987","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"quant-ph","submitted_at":"2023-09-22T16:32:39Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"95f0333289c7ef75d0252df2e44992e251b60e638d98924b7b45424fbc3af19b","abstract_canon_sha256":"b2efc0ef6c6d3a5452a233cfb5d716a79869f357356d4d73de8820e773c8921f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:17.101869Z","signature_b64":"MkR8gIjif+ULxxPKJfKpDx3O8CKYTugoVJ34VFba/PuWekW6YAn48xLASaDN1gZfuVDFVe9V5qXJ36PKQxU7Aw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"956afab3ac96476d9061cadaca2638641e311a769c6aec3a80e148be35b01ac0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:17.101276Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:17.101276Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Relating Wigner's Friend Scenarios to Nonclassical Causal Compatibility, Monogamy Relations, and Fine Tuning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"quant-ph","authors_text":"Andrea Di Biagio, David Schmid, Elie Wolfe, Eric Gama Cavalcanti, Marina Maciel Ansanelli, Y\\`il\\`e Y\\=ing","submitted_at":"2023-09-22T16:32:39Z","abstract_excerpt":"Nonclassical causal modeling was developed in order to explain violations of Bell inequalities while adhering to relativistic causal structure and faithfulness -- that is, avoiding fine-tuned causal explanations. Recently, a no-go theorem that can be viewed as being stronger than Bell's theorem has been derived, based on extensions of the Wigner's friend thought experiment: the Local Friendliness (LF) no-go theorem. Here we show that the LF no-go theorem poses formidable challenges for the field of causal modeling, even when nonclassical and/or cyclic causal explanations are considered. We fir"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2309.12987","kind":"arxiv","version":4},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2309.12987/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2309.12987","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:17.101349+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2309.12987v4","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:17.101349+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2309.12987","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:17.101349+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SVVPVM5MSZDW","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:17.101349+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDB","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:17.101349+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SVVPVM5M","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:17.101349+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.14538","citing_title":"Are free choices absolute, when internalized in Wigner's friend?","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.17839","citing_title":"What Do Black Holes Teach Us About Wigner's Friend?","ref_index":46,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SVVPVM5M"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SVVPVM5M","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2309.12987&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SVVPVM5MSZDW3EDBZLNMUJRYMQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:17.101349+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:14:17.101349+00:00"}