{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA","short_pith_number":"pith:SZRBQK25","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9662182b5d41a9ed6ac8fd4d0115bf880df3d8e6348c8d1eac64231669893571","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2512.06471","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Why Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning Works: Relation to Dual Control","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning succeeds because its reward represents the probability of reaching target states, yielding a smaller optimality gap than classical quadratic objectives and suiting it to dual control.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ali Mesbah, Nathan P. Lawrence","submitted_at":"2025-12-06T15:28:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning (RL) concerns the problem of training an agent to maximize the probability of reaching target goal states. This paper presents an analysis of the goal-conditioned setting based on optimal control. In particular, we derive an optimality gap between more classical, often quadratic, objectives and the goal-conditioned reward, elucidating the success of goal-conditioned RL and why classical ``dense'' rewards can falter. We then consider the partially observed Markov decision setting and connect state estimation to our probabilistic reward, making the goal-co"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":true},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2512.06471","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-12-06T15:28:35Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"72b7a0aead423de5ff3232f497621bb6590a182c6b94f97156784ac26df32b67","abstract_canon_sha256":"1f3dee88a1f7937337015abb3a085ed697aca02282d04d6ee24436c3c0418f41"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00.583906Z","signature_b64":"LfY2qAX/NiWVw7O6jo01t33UDaya9oR2bAotE6DiAebUtodgcrEL0qk+q+wyH7JQkV4oMegnJmy0eLmLXTRMBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9662182b5d41a9ed6ac8fd4d0115bf880df3d8e6348c8d1eac64231669893571","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00.583124Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00.583124Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Why Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning Works: Relation to Dual Control","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning succeeds because its reward represents the probability of reaching target states, yielding a smaller optimality gap than classical quadratic objectives and suiting it to dual control.","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Ali Mesbah, Nathan P. Lawrence","submitted_at":"2025-12-06T15:28:35Z","abstract_excerpt":"Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning (RL) concerns the problem of training an agent to maximize the probability of reaching target goal states. This paper presents an analysis of the goal-conditioned setting based on optimal control. In particular, we derive an optimality gap between more classical, often quadratic, objectives and the goal-conditioned reward, elucidating the success of goal-conditioned RL and why classical ``dense'' rewards can falter. We then consider the partially observed Markov decision setting and connect state estimation to our probabilistic reward, making the goal-co"},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"we derive an optimality gap between more classical, often quadratic, objectives and the goal-conditioned reward, elucidating the success of goal-conditioned RL and why classical ``dense'' rewards can falter. We then consider the partially observed Markov decision setting and connect state estimation to our probabilistic reward, making the goal-conditioned reward well suited to dual control problems.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"The analysis assumes that the goal-conditioned reward can be interpreted directly as a probability of reaching target states and that this interpretation transfers without additional unstated restrictions on the system dynamics or observation model when moving to the POMDP and dual-control setting.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Goal-conditioned RL succeeds over dense rewards because its probabilistic goal-reaching objective aligns naturally with dual control requirements in uncertain, partially observed systems.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning succeeds because its reward represents the probability of reaching target states, yielding a smaller optimality gap than classical quadratic objectives and suiting it to dual control.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"70b40642b31f1f375b2c1ec6a3afe54633b812ce331e44fdf92e6ca0bc55fda0"},"source":{"id":"2512.06471","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":"9a7c26e3-749b-46b8-9daf-378c9ec8c9e1","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-17T00:34:21.113237Z","strongest_claim":"we derive an optimality gap between more classical, often quadratic, objectives and the goal-conditioned reward, elucidating the success of goal-conditioned RL and why classical ``dense'' rewards can falter. We then consider the partially observed Markov decision setting and connect state estimation to our probabilistic reward, making the goal-conditioned reward well suited to dual control problems.","one_line_summary":"Goal-conditioned RL succeeds over dense rewards because its probabilistic goal-reaching objective aligns naturally with dual control requirements in uncertain, partially observed systems.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"The analysis assumes that the goal-conditioned reward can be interpreted directly as a probability of reaching target states and that this interpretation transfers without additional unstated restrictions on the system dynamics or observation model when moving to the POMDP and dual-control setting.","pith_extraction_headline":"Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning succeeds because its reward represents the probability of reaching target states, yielding a smaller optimality gap than classical quadratic objectives and suiting it to dual control."},"references":{"count":3,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":1974,"title":"Bar-Shalom, Y. and Tse, E. (1974). Dual effect, certainty equivalence, and separation in stochastic control.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(5), 494–500. Bayard, D.S. and Schumitzky, A. (201","work_id":"529407f9-f5d8-4324-9e4f-d017932e30cb","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2003,"title":"Athena scientific. Chen, Z. (2003). Bayesian filtering: From Kalman filters to particle filters, and beyond.Statistics, 182(1), 1–69. Drgoˇ na, J., Kiˇ s, K., Tuor, A., Vrabie, D., and Klauˇ co, M. (2","work_id":"1f850bfa-57e8-427f-9deb-f092399d598c","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2025,"title":"Vyas, N., Morwani, D., Zhao, R., Kwun, M., Shapira, I., Brandfonbrener, D., Janson, L., and Kakade, S","work_id":"cfa4927a-bb15-4530-8f2f-c3a94293a3fe","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":3,"snapshot_sha256":"29292371b13746bf47fd245a783774c7bc96dd3a1df84070cfe5a67c3f85d8f4","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"3f541339ad2e74fb54896cde805d2176d702883a507df23eae94608fe236db54"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2512.06471","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00.583259+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2512.06471v2","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00.583259+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2512.06471","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00.583259+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SZRBQK25IGU6","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SZRBQK25IGU622WI","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SZRBQK25","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SZRBQK25"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SZRBQK25","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2512.06471&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00.583259+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00.583259+00:00"}