{"state_type":"pith_open_graph_state","state_version":"1.0","pith_number":"pith:2025:SZRBQK25IGU622WI7VGQCFN7RA","merge_version":"pith-open-graph-merge-v1","event_count":2,"valid_event_count":2,"invalid_event_count":0,"equivocation_count":0,"current":{"canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"1f3dee88a1f7937337015abb3a085ed697aca02282d04d6ee24436c3c0418f41","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-12-06T15:28:35Z","title_canon_sha256":"72b7a0aead423de5ff3232f497621bb6590a182c6b94f97156784ac26df32b67"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2512.06471","kind":"arxiv","version":2}},"source_aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2512.06471","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00Z"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2512.06471v2","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00Z"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2512.06471","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SZRBQK25IGU6","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SZRBQK25IGU622WI","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SZRBQK25","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37Z"}],"graph_snapshots":[{"event_id":"sha256:42ec4db530f8c66904c7729396891164afe8e8ad3a72e6ad9c107675a59288e2","target":"graph","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"graph_snapshot":{"author_claims":{"count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","strong_count":0},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C1","kind":"strongest_claim","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","text":"we derive an optimality gap between more classical, often quadratic, objectives and the goal-conditioned reward, elucidating the success of goal-conditioned RL and why classical ``dense'' rewards can falter. We then consider the partially observed Markov decision setting and connect state estimation to our probabilistic reward, making the goal-conditioned reward well suited to dual control problems."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C2","kind":"weakest_assumption","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","text":"The analysis assumes that the goal-conditioned reward can be interpreted directly as a probability of reaching target states and that this interpretation transfers without additional unstated restrictions on the system dynamics or observation model when moving to the POMDP and dual-control setting."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C3","kind":"one_line_summary","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Goal-conditioned RL succeeds over dense rewards because its probabilistic goal-reaching objective aligns naturally with dual control requirements in uncertain, partially observed systems."},{"attestation":"unclaimed","claim_id":"C4","kind":"headline","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","text":"Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning succeeds because its reward represents the probability of reaching target states, yielding a smaller optimality gap than classical quadratic objectives and suiting it to dual control."}],"snapshot_sha256":"70b40642b31f1f375b2c1ec6a3afe54633b812ce331e44fdf92e6ca0bc55fda0"},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":2,"snapshot_sha256":"3f541339ad2e74fb54896cde805d2176d702883a507df23eae94608fe236db54"},"paper":{"abstract_excerpt":"Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning (RL) concerns the problem of training an agent to maximize the probability of reaching target goal states. This paper presents an analysis of the goal-conditioned setting based on optimal control. In particular, we derive an optimality gap between more classical, often quadratic, objectives and the goal-conditioned reward, elucidating the success of goal-conditioned RL and why classical ``dense'' rewards can falter. We then consider the partially observed Markov decision setting and connect state estimation to our probabilistic reward, making the goal-co","authors_text":"Ali Mesbah, Nathan P. Lawrence","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"headline":"Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning succeeds because its reward represents the probability of reaching target states, yielding a smaller optimality gap than classical quadratic objectives and suiting it to dual control.","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-12-06T15:28:35Z","title":"Why Goal-Conditioned Reinforcement Learning Works: Relation to Dual Control"},"references":{"count":3,"internal_anchors":0,"resolved_work":3,"sample":[{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":1,"title":"Bar-Shalom, Y. and Tse, E. (1974). Dual effect, certainty equivalence, and separation in stochastic control.IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(5), 494–500. Bayard, D.S. and Schumitzky, A. (201","work_id":"529407f9-f5d8-4324-9e4f-d017932e30cb","year":1974},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":2,"title":"Athena scientific. Chen, Z. (2003). Bayesian filtering: From Kalman filters to particle filters, and beyond.Statistics, 182(1), 1–69. Drgoˇ na, J., Kiˇ s, K., Tuor, A., Vrabie, D., and Klauˇ co, M. (2","work_id":"1f850bfa-57e8-427f-9deb-f092399d598c","year":2003},{"cited_arxiv_id":"","doi":"","is_internal_anchor":false,"ref_index":3,"title":"Vyas, N., Morwani, D., Zhao, R., Kwun, M., Shapira, I., Brandfonbrener, D., Janson, L., and Kakade, S","work_id":"cfa4927a-bb15-4530-8f2f-c3a94293a3fe","year":2025}],"snapshot_sha256":"29292371b13746bf47fd245a783774c7bc96dd3a1df84070cfe5a67c3f85d8f4"},"source":{"id":"2512.06471","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"created_at":"2026-05-17T00:34:21.113237Z","id":"9a7c26e3-749b-46b8-9daf-378c9ec8c9e1","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"one_line_summary":"Goal-conditioned RL succeeds over dense rewards because its probabilistic goal-reaching objective aligns naturally with dual control requirements in uncertain, partially observed systems.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","pith_extraction_headline":"Goal-conditioned reinforcement learning succeeds because its reward represents the probability of reaching target states, yielding a smaller optimality gap than classical quadratic objectives and suiting it to dual control.","strongest_claim":"we derive an optimality gap between more classical, often quadratic, objectives and the goal-conditioned reward, elucidating the success of goal-conditioned RL and why classical ``dense'' rewards can falter. We then consider the partially observed Markov decision setting and connect state estimation to our probabilistic reward, making the goal-conditioned reward well suited to dual control problems.","weakest_assumption":"The analysis assumes that the goal-conditioned reward can be interpreted directly as a probability of reaching target states and that this interpretation transfers without additional unstated restrictions on the system dynamics or observation model when moving to the POMDP and dual-control setting."}},"verdict_id":"9a7c26e3-749b-46b8-9daf-378c9ec8c9e1"}}],"author_attestations":[],"timestamp_anchors":[],"storage_attestations":[],"citation_signatures":[],"replication_records":[],"corrections":[],"mirror_hints":[],"record_created":{"event_id":"sha256:a1408b8b7a2e3bcc76ceedfdc8ef40833c090da80d3811602bd7263029800449","target":"record","created_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00Z","signer":{"key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","signer_id":"pith.science","signer_type":"pith_registry"},"payload":{"attestation_state":"computed","canonical_record":{"metadata":{"abstract_canon_sha256":"1f3dee88a1f7937337015abb3a085ed697aca02282d04d6ee24436c3c0418f41","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-12-06T15:28:35Z","title_canon_sha256":"72b7a0aead423de5ff3232f497621bb6590a182c6b94f97156784ac26df32b67"},"schema_version":"1.0","source":{"id":"2512.06471","kind":"arxiv","version":2}},"canonical_sha256":"9662182b5d41a9ed6ac8fd4d0115bf880df3d8e6348c8d1eac64231669893571","receipt":{"algorithm":"ed25519","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","canonical_sha256":"9662182b5d41a9ed6ac8fd4d0115bf880df3d8e6348c8d1eac64231669893571","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00.583124Z","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","kind":"pith_receipt","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00.583124Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54","receipt_version":"0.3","signature_b64":"LfY2qAX/NiWVw7O6jo01t33UDaya9oR2bAotE6DiAebUtodgcrEL0qk+q+wyH7JQkV4oMegnJmy0eLmLXTRMBA==","signature_status":"signed_v1","signed_at":"2026-05-17T23:39:00.583906Z","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes"},"source_id":"2512.06471","source_kind":"arxiv","source_version":2}}},"equivocations":[],"invalid_events":[],"applied_event_ids":["sha256:a1408b8b7a2e3bcc76ceedfdc8ef40833c090da80d3811602bd7263029800449","sha256:42ec4db530f8c66904c7729396891164afe8e8ad3a72e6ad9c107675a59288e2"],"state_sha256":"eb548829a9b375b3f23995ee3bbdaf24de1322b6b86c15fad49b7531a9b9d07d"}