{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ","short_pith_number":"pith:SZXMXGM2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"966ecb999a3de8e963007d0151a75c7c22ec435ee672534f0440a6f028acb0de","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2212.09292","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Teo Susnjak","submitted_at":"2022-12-19T08:15:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"This study evaluated the ability of ChatGPT, a recently developed artificial intelligence (AI) agent, to perform high-level cognitive tasks and produce text that is indistinguishable from human-generated text. This capacity raises concerns about the potential use of ChatGPT as a tool for academic misconduct in online exams. The study found that ChatGPT is capable of exhibiting critical thinking skills and generating highly realistic text with minimal input, making it a potential threat to the integrity of online exams, particularly in tertiary education settings where such exams are becoming m"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2212.09292","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2022-12-19T08:15:16Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"fe55b509bbec9f958085c9ca56477073668211d264314e19320a4a2de07b28b8","abstract_canon_sha256":"10a0b734c2f20ec89d413cee8dac2e208ffae36642b8e5fd8d2958409c94beef"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:20.605196Z","signature_b64":"kIg8T5yzYj31foz9AccDCOow12rWx5ZP2PsI6uqBpuyp1DvxEsjg0uhBe6oV3wTZtHBgRDr40s3YBl90DjusDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"966ecb999a3de8e963007d0151a75c7c22ec435ee672534f0440a6f028acb0de","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:20.604684Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:20.604684Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"ChatGPT: The End of Online Exam Integrity?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Teo Susnjak","submitted_at":"2022-12-19T08:15:16Z","abstract_excerpt":"This study evaluated the ability of ChatGPT, a recently developed artificial intelligence (AI) agent, to perform high-level cognitive tasks and produce text that is indistinguishable from human-generated text. This capacity raises concerns about the potential use of ChatGPT as a tool for academic misconduct in online exams. The study found that ChatGPT is capable of exhibiting critical thinking skills and generating highly realistic text with minimal input, making it a potential threat to the integrity of online exams, particularly in tertiary education settings where such exams are becoming m"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2212.09292","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2212.09292/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2212.09292","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:20.604745+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2212.09292v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:20.604745+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2212.09292","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:20.604745+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"SZXMXGM2HXUO","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:20.604745+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYA","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:20.604745+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"SZXMXGM2","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:20.604745+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12363","citing_title":"Reimagining Assessment in the Age of Generative AI: Lessons from Open-Book Exams with ChatGPT","ref_index":5,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SZXMXGM2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/SZXMXGM2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2212.09292&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/SZXMXGM2HXUOSYYAPUAVDJ24PQ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:20.604745+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:26:20.604745+00:00"}