{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE","short_pith_number":"pith:T2KAIQDT","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9e94044073b3fe6e5c78a382b206fc41133c570c084d517a5ad0b8044763bd5a","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2508.07935","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"SHIELDA: Structured Handling of Exceptions in LLM-Driven Agentic Workflows","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Dehai Zhao, Jieshan Chen, Jingwen Zhou, Liming Zhu, Qinghua Lu","submitted_at":"2025-08-11T12:50:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Model (LLM) agentic systems are software systems powered by LLMs that autonomously reason, plan, and execute multi-step workflows to achieve human goals, rather than merely executing predefined steps. During execution, these workflows frequently encounter exceptions. Existing exception handling solutions often treat exceptions superficially, failing to trace execution-phase exceptions to their reasoning-phase root causes. Furthermore, their recovery logic is brittle, lacking structured escalation pathways when initial attempts fail. To tackle these challenges, we first present a"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2508.07935","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2025-08-11T12:50:46Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"2c896cd9ee22ad1b22106e676250620d5ca98c988ab2baa19c870a37816100e5","abstract_canon_sha256":"a4b96e8cb1433d9adb7f55f32c48f976c7a2a683922c6ba4d7a7f14b3f3fa6f2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:05.153277Z","signature_b64":"q2+lluHLkvrXUsdEe7xsoT9iF7UGWef3xWIpUIjd2uptevk/sXHfWAAMHguTUgqZAPPGb+jY1GTVaCIlONzeAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9e94044073b3fe6e5c78a382b206fc41133c570c084d517a5ad0b8044763bd5a","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:05.152715Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:05.152715Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"SHIELDA: Structured Handling of Exceptions in LLM-Driven Agentic Workflows","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Dehai Zhao, Jieshan Chen, Jingwen Zhou, Liming Zhu, Qinghua Lu","submitted_at":"2025-08-11T12:50:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Model (LLM) agentic systems are software systems powered by LLMs that autonomously reason, plan, and execute multi-step workflows to achieve human goals, rather than merely executing predefined steps. During execution, these workflows frequently encounter exceptions. Existing exception handling solutions often treat exceptions superficially, failing to trace execution-phase exceptions to their reasoning-phase root causes. Furthermore, their recovery logic is brittle, lacking structured escalation pathways when initial attempts fail. To tackle these challenges, we first present a"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2508.07935","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2508.07935/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2508.07935","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:05.152779+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2508.07935v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:05.152779+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2508.07935","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:05.152779+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"T2KAIQDTWP7G","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:05.152779+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDY","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:05.152779+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"T2KAIQDT","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:05.152779+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.07017","citing_title":"The Sim-to-Real Gap of Foundation Model Agents: A Unified MDP Perspective","ref_index":62,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.01581","citing_title":"Agent System Operations: Categorization, Challenges, and Future Directions","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.23414","citing_title":"When Planning Fails Despite Correct Execution: On Epistemic Calibration for LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems","ref_index":91,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23505","citing_title":"Uncertainty Propagation in LLM-Based Systems","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/T2KAIQDT"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/T2KAIQDT","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2508.07935&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/T2KAIQDTWP7G4XDYUOBLEBX4IE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:05.152779+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:52:05.152779+00:00"}