{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY","short_pith_number":"pith:T3IVRDZP","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9ed1588f2f339e7c4698e57f48f45a76111f174849beaaad70dc075f20d2b2c6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.16310","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"An Empirical Exploration of Trust Dynamics in LLM Supply Chains","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Agathe Balayn, Fabio Casati, Fanny Rancourt, Mireia Yurrita, Ujwal Gadiraju","submitted_at":"2024-05-25T17:37:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the widespread proliferation of AI systems, trust in AI is an important and timely topic to navigate. Researchers so far have largely employed a myopic view of this relationship. In particular, a limited number of relevant trustors (e.g., end-users) and trustees (i.e., AI systems) have been considered, and empirical explorations have remained in laboratory settings, potentially overlooking factors that impact human-AI relationships in the real world. In this paper, we argue for broadening the scope of studies addressing `trust in AI' by accounting for the complex and dynamic supply chains"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.16310","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2024-05-25T17:37:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"c9ea8f924f8ec92d0f79737d789369029fda08fa60ad6f9e6f5f92d8345621ba","abstract_canon_sha256":"32e544d15fb8b7c1ae90210adafa56f682135e88d2a9ac004fb369dffa10ec15"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:28.434874Z","signature_b64":"9uzBVvOeeAE9s//Sq2JluRK7HicVEbYGPN+2AVts/fkIBPE9whER8GaYuaIA3D+lI5x8lMg5n12aQnjQ32JfDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9ed1588f2f339e7c4698e57f48f45a76111f174849beaaad70dc075f20d2b2c6","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:28.434489Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:28.434489Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"An Empirical Exploration of Trust Dynamics in LLM Supply Chains","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Agathe Balayn, Fabio Casati, Fanny Rancourt, Mireia Yurrita, Ujwal Gadiraju","submitted_at":"2024-05-25T17:37:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the widespread proliferation of AI systems, trust in AI is an important and timely topic to navigate. Researchers so far have largely employed a myopic view of this relationship. In particular, a limited number of relevant trustors (e.g., end-users) and trustees (i.e., AI systems) have been considered, and empirical explorations have remained in laboratory settings, potentially overlooking factors that impact human-AI relationships in the real world. In this paper, we argue for broadening the scope of studies addressing `trust in AI' by accounting for the complex and dynamic supply chains"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.16310","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.16310/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.16310","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:28.434549+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.16310v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:28.434549+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.16310","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:28.434549+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"T3IVRDZPGOPH","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:28.434549+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:28.434549+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"T3IVRDZP","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:28.434549+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":3,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.13468","citing_title":"Understanding the Rejection of Fixes Generated by Agentic Pull Requests -- Insights from the AIDev Dataset","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2503.16771","citing_title":"Enabling Global, Human-Centered Explanations for LLMs:From Tokens to Interpretable Code and Test Generation","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2509.08010","citing_title":"Measuring and mitigating overreliance to build human-compatible AI","ref_index":8,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY","json":"https://pith.science/pith/T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/T3IVRDZP"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/T3IVRDZP","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.16310&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/T3IVRDZPGOPHYRUY4V7UR5C2OY/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:28.434549+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:23:28.434549+00:00"}