{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36","short_pith_number":"pith:T45K4YVH","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9f3aae62a73ea9942bfbe97f163e98dfbfbfea45f980e36f16f5f666b020f1ac","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2501.14959","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Systemizing Multiplicity: The Curious Case of Arbitrariness in Machine Learning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Afaf Taik, Golnoosh Farnadi, Prakhar Ganesh","submitted_at":"2025-01-24T22:45:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Algorithmic modeling relies on limited information in data to extrapolate outcomes for unseen scenarios, often embedding an element of arbitrariness in its decisions. A perspective on this arbitrariness that has recently gained interest is multiplicity-the study of arbitrariness across a set of \"good models\", i.e., those likely to be deployed in practice. In this work, we systemize the literature on multiplicity by: (a) formalizing the terminology around model design choices and their contribution to arbitrariness, (b) expanding the definition of multiplicity to incorporate underrepresented fo"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2501.14959","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2025-01-24T22:45:09Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"8d7bd8040e1a791259ed4603747262e933a20516d53ade809e98174db6c36afc","abstract_canon_sha256":"02f3ab07cc4d84f6ae61273e430cb9704685e1a4a34e6bdba7da38ddea6c07a5"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:30.362622Z","signature_b64":"2Gvvs3p2WQQBkB0v+13WGERhrm9yYkzUJHUdnGMB5Tf/JHQeGhALYGkwmk79fT7xdf59EjDOyMTtxg54wAyGCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9f3aae62a73ea9942bfbe97f163e98dfbfbfea45f980e36f16f5f666b020f1ac","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:30.362199Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:30.362199Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Systemizing Multiplicity: The Curious Case of Arbitrariness in Machine Learning","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Afaf Taik, Golnoosh Farnadi, Prakhar Ganesh","submitted_at":"2025-01-24T22:45:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Algorithmic modeling relies on limited information in data to extrapolate outcomes for unseen scenarios, often embedding an element of arbitrariness in its decisions. A perspective on this arbitrariness that has recently gained interest is multiplicity-the study of arbitrariness across a set of \"good models\", i.e., those likely to be deployed in practice. In this work, we systemize the literature on multiplicity by: (a) formalizing the terminology around model design choices and their contribution to arbitrariness, (b) expanding the definition of multiplicity to incorporate underrepresented fo"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2501.14959","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2501.14959/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2501.14959","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:30.362260+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2501.14959v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:30.362260+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2501.14959","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:30.362260+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"T45K4YVHH2UZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:30.362260+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"T45K4YVHH2UZIK73","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:30.362260+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"T45K4YVH","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:30.362260+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.09520","citing_title":"Rashomon Sets and Model Multiplicity in Federated Learning","ref_index":22,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23954","citing_title":"An empirical evaluation of the risks of AI model updates using clinical data: stability, arbitrariness, and fairness","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36","json":"https://pith.science/pith/T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/T45K4YVH"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/T45K4YVH","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2501.14959&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/T45K4YVHH2UZIK735F7RMPUY36/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:30.362260+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:50:30.362260+00:00"}