{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI","short_pith_number":"pith:T4DPJMWM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9f06f4b2cc2a24cebcc777f289b614a230dab46bd5aae5d0ee5233cee49c23b3","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2204.07661","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Finding Pareto Trade-offs in Fair and Accurate Detection of Toxic Speech","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Anubrata Das, Maria De-Arteaga, Matthew Lease, Soumyajit Gupta, Venelin Kovatchev","submitted_at":"2022-04-15T22:11:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Optimizing NLP models for fairness poses many challenges. Lack of differentiable fairness measures prevents gradient-based loss training or requires surrogate losses that diverge from the true metric of interest. In addition, competing objectives (e.g., accuracy vs. fairness) often require making trade-offs based on stakeholder preferences, but stakeholders may not know their preferences before seeing system performance under different trade-off settings. To address these challenges, we begin by formulating a differentiable version of a popular fairness measure, Accuracy Parity, to provide bal"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2204.07661","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2022-04-15T22:11:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b59dea7f37a6430189b32b8c1b7f3784a39d5b9500a117754bf48a17e9049d26","abstract_canon_sha256":"3525a3b96f1107d7810a750e1335d2c5dd5a21d4f914e33f795b1b2da3be8735"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:23:13.036563Z","signature_b64":"xgsUBoZktJBd2RaiNdfbrdOYS/n34eR6vUlWjx7KVWtiApQrzyFzDUItn4skA/rngWLdyXvQtqEM7Rfq8O+DAg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9f06f4b2cc2a24cebcc777f289b614a230dab46bd5aae5d0ee5233cee49c23b3","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:23:13.035947Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:23:13.035947Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Finding Pareto Trade-offs in Fair and Accurate Detection of Toxic Speech","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Anubrata Das, Maria De-Arteaga, Matthew Lease, Soumyajit Gupta, Venelin Kovatchev","submitted_at":"2022-04-15T22:11:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Optimizing NLP models for fairness poses many challenges. Lack of differentiable fairness measures prevents gradient-based loss training or requires surrogate losses that diverge from the true metric of interest. In addition, competing objectives (e.g., accuracy vs. fairness) often require making trade-offs based on stakeholder preferences, but stakeholders may not know their preferences before seeing system performance under different trade-off settings. To address these challenges, we begin by formulating a differentiable version of a popular fairness measure, Accuracy Parity, to provide bal"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2204.07661","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2204.07661/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2204.07661","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:23:13.036025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2204.07661v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:23:13.036025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2204.07661","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:23:13.036025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"T4DPJMWMFISM","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:23:13.036025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"T4DPJMWMFISM5PGH","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:23:13.036025+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"T4DPJMWM","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:23:13.036025+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.07249","citing_title":"Bias Attribution in Filipino Language Models: Extending a Bias Interpretability Metric for Application on Agglutinative Languages","ref_index":20,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/T4DPJMWM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/T4DPJMWM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2204.07661&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/T4DPJMWMFISM5PGHO7ZITNQUUI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:23:13.036025+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:23:13.036025+00:00"}