{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K","short_pith_number":"pith:T4KJPJ66","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9f1497a7deabd0979603e9068f626fd2a915a390ca12c7dd5e7e8c4ce5000cae","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2412.00828","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"What You See Is What You Get: Attention-based Self-guided Automatic Unit Test Generation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Chao Ni, Xiaodan Xu, Xiaohu Yang, Xin Yin","submitted_at":"2024-12-01T14:28:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Software defects heavily affect software's functionalities and may cause huge losses. Recently, many AI-based approaches have been proposed to detect defects, which can be divided into two categories: software defect prediction and automatic unit test generation. While these approaches have made great progress in software defect detection, they still have several limitations in practical application, including the low confidence of prediction models and the inefficiency of unit testing models. To address these limitations, we propose a WYSIWYG (i.e., What You See Is What You Get) approach: Att"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2412.00828","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2024-12-01T14:28:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"1b1a5a70374ecaca34a0ed40d8a277ba63893e7d2197109101bd933e285b4e97","abstract_canon_sha256":"671faf3904028624901b6032e23bea0f9bf47ea027a480f72a54d2c59d6537fb"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:48.514962Z","signature_b64":"iwgoWT7G3AnCxkvxU7zz8r1WQkWrVdiAK5SjS9beik9gVr3nApZphd3wtbjiJfkCKtly1PMVb3B6Bz7XfCn7Ag==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9f1497a7deabd0979603e9068f626fd2a915a390ca12c7dd5e7e8c4ce5000cae","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:48.514378Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:48.514378Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"What You See Is What You Get: Attention-based Self-guided Automatic Unit Test Generation","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Chao Ni, Xiaodan Xu, Xiaohu Yang, Xin Yin","submitted_at":"2024-12-01T14:28:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"Software defects heavily affect software's functionalities and may cause huge losses. Recently, many AI-based approaches have been proposed to detect defects, which can be divided into two categories: software defect prediction and automatic unit test generation. While these approaches have made great progress in software defect detection, they still have several limitations in practical application, including the low confidence of prediction models and the inefficiency of unit testing models. To address these limitations, we propose a WYSIWYG (i.e., What You See Is What You Get) approach: Att"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2412.00828","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2412.00828/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2412.00828","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:48.514450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2412.00828v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:48.514450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2412.00828","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:48.514450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"T4KJPJ66VPIJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:48.514450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:48.514450+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"T4KJPJ66","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:48.514450+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23509","citing_title":"Uncovering Business Logic Bugs via Semantics-Driven Unit Test Generation","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K","json":"https://pith.science/pith/T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/T4KJPJ66"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/T4KJPJ66","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2412.00828&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/T4KJPJ66VPIJPFQD5EDI6YTP2K/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:48.514450+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:42:48.514450+00:00"}