{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2015:T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47","short_pith_number":"pith:T4YG25RD","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9f306d7623552d58e702e3d4f5cea5e7cf31b1df74164a8516ed462ec1d9496e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1503.08551","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Analysis of Clause set Schema Aided by Automated Theorem Proving: A Case Study [Extended Paper]","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Alexander Leitsch, David Cerna","submitted_at":"2015-03-30T06:31:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"The schematic CERES method [8] is a recently developed method of cut elimination for proof schemata, that is a sequence of proofs with a recursive construction. Proof schemata can be thought of as a way to circumvent adding an induction rule to the LK-calculus. In this work, we formalize a schematic version of the infinitary pigeonhole principle, which we call the Non-injectivity Assertion schema (NiA-schema), in the LKS-calculus [8], and analyse the clause set schema extracted from the NiA-schema using some of the structure provided by the schematic CERES method. To the best of our knowledge,"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1503.08551","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LO","submitted_at":"2015-03-30T06:31:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"4ec76d50d493f31330302563039bf9193df5216f46a2cbca5c7ed96062dda162","abstract_canon_sha256":"15e9f9d705d87cb425d321bc506d45f8606866b304ca2b55576485fa3cba7c59"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:20:01.434672Z","signature_b64":"257vytFrEhOeJDQhS8Ve4EjsIyf3gDe9uSmBlfZBCsFdG7Xz2USqJH7XRQdyCucwTT/BaxafDyTjO0NpptHEAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9f306d7623552d58e702e3d4f5cea5e7cf31b1df74164a8516ed462ec1d9496e","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:20:01.434024Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:20:01.434024Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Analysis of Clause set Schema Aided by Automated Theorem Proving: A Case Study [Extended Paper]","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Alexander Leitsch, David Cerna","submitted_at":"2015-03-30T06:31:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"The schematic CERES method [8] is a recently developed method of cut elimination for proof schemata, that is a sequence of proofs with a recursive construction. Proof schemata can be thought of as a way to circumvent adding an induction rule to the LK-calculus. In this work, we formalize a schematic version of the infinitary pigeonhole principle, which we call the Non-injectivity Assertion schema (NiA-schema), in the LKS-calculus [8], and analyse the clause set schema extracted from the NiA-schema using some of the structure provided by the schematic CERES method. To the best of our knowledge,"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1503.08551","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1503.08551","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:20:01.434118+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1503.08551v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:20:01.434118+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1503.08551","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:20:01.434118+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"T4YG25RDKUWV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:42.218222+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:42.218222+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"T4YG25RD","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:29:42.218222+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47","json":"https://pith.science/pith/T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/T4YG25RD"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/T4YG25RD","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1503.08551&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/T4YG25RDKUWVRZYC4PKPLTVF47/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:20:01.434118+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T02:20:01.434118+00:00"}