{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG","short_pith_number":"pith:TA6SZDH6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"983d2c8cfe5d3e1b2673762f5ab48f91959dc56bb77d2c42ebd86a697f8adcf6","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2506.04182","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Long or short CoT? Investigating Instance-level Switch of Large Reasoning Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Changyi Xiao, Ruiqi Zhang, Yixin Cao","submitted_at":"2025-06-04T17:28:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the rapid advancement of large reasoning models, long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has demonstrated strong performance on complex tasks. However, this often comes with a significant increase in token usage. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive empirical analysis comparing long and short CoT strategies. Our findings reveal that while long CoT can lead to performance improvements, its benefits are often marginal relative to its significantly higher token consumption. Specifically, long CoT tends to outperform when ample generation budgets are available, whereas short CoT is more ef"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2506.04182","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-06-04T17:28:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"cf78605e6769b20358c82b5f473d069e34c618f78713213fe9f682f6877fb9ac","abstract_canon_sha256":"6a4d2095d8c925efa99ccf43eb5c3369b092c99c3e7dc67749cdfcbd50f1dd04"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:58.469863Z","signature_b64":"sN2QvgxeVblEf85UwNDfr8jtqeI7DI0sTkDSYTMJX5H5Mf1OnGVZe+4om5HwP8DwDhNuAl37ZmhxHfHASDsXDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"983d2c8cfe5d3e1b2673762f5ab48f91959dc56bb77d2c42ebd86a697f8adcf6","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:58.469414Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:58.469414Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Long or short CoT? Investigating Instance-level Switch of Large Reasoning Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Changyi Xiao, Ruiqi Zhang, Yixin Cao","submitted_at":"2025-06-04T17:28:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the rapid advancement of large reasoning models, long Chain-of-Thought (CoT) prompting has demonstrated strong performance on complex tasks. However, this often comes with a significant increase in token usage. In this paper, we conduct a comprehensive empirical analysis comparing long and short CoT strategies. Our findings reveal that while long CoT can lead to performance improvements, its benefits are often marginal relative to its significantly higher token consumption. Specifically, long CoT tends to outperform when ample generation budgets are available, whereas short CoT is more ef"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2506.04182","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2506.04182/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2506.04182","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:58.469472+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2506.04182v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:58.469472+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2506.04182","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:58.469472+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TA6SZDH6LU7B","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:58.469472+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTT","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:58.469472+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TA6SZDH6","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:58.469472+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2507.09662","citing_title":"Towards Concise and Adaptive Thinking in Large Reasoning Models: A Survey","ref_index":242,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TA6SZDH6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TA6SZDH6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2506.04182&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TA6SZDH6LU7BWJTTOYXVVNEPSG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:58.469472+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:15:58.469472+00:00"}