{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2","short_pith_number":"pith:TAVOFMZG","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"982ae2b326cf11208da96f82c1fcc29e898a06edb140a30f296fad319e7ecc80","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.18747","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"DESI Constraints on Exponential Quintessence","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"David Rubin, Jeremy Sakstein, Omar F. Ramadan","submitted_at":"2024-05-29T04:09:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"The DESI collaboration have recently analyzed their first year of data, finding a preference for thawing dark energy scenarios when using parameterized equations of state for dark energy. We investigate whether this preference persists when the data is analyzed within the context of a well-studied field theory model of thawing dark energy, exponential quintessence. No preference for this model over $\\Lambda$CDM is found, and both models are poorer fits to the data than the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder $w_0$--$w_a$ parameterization. We demonstrate that the worse fit is due to a lack of sharp feat"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.18747","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2024-05-29T04:09:59Z","cross_cats_sorted":["gr-qc","hep-th"],"title_canon_sha256":"906dfe8ef60086eaff585b7c0b3f4d354e47890bf857ca9de70e3a486b1442ec","abstract_canon_sha256":"6dc6a4de31c5cbbb4754623b3f329a1992640a2b2af921eb977b654843903460"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:24:29.709954Z","signature_b64":"0gxCBCQTyJcVyZPg2UT+XcXuep+Cm0lRoojo6PUCgKuusc1VQ6ZLhS5J56H2JruHBMiSAR6cZxmNJZ5tWUfIAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"982ae2b326cf11208da96f82c1fcc29e898a06edb140a30f296fad319e7ecc80","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:24:29.709491Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:24:29.709491Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"DESI Constraints on Exponential Quintessence","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["gr-qc","hep-th"],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"David Rubin, Jeremy Sakstein, Omar F. Ramadan","submitted_at":"2024-05-29T04:09:59Z","abstract_excerpt":"The DESI collaboration have recently analyzed their first year of data, finding a preference for thawing dark energy scenarios when using parameterized equations of state for dark energy. We investigate whether this preference persists when the data is analyzed within the context of a well-studied field theory model of thawing dark energy, exponential quintessence. No preference for this model over $\\Lambda$CDM is found, and both models are poorer fits to the data than the Chevallier-Polarski-Linder $w_0$--$w_a$ parameterization. We demonstrate that the worse fit is due to a lack of sharp feat"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.18747","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.18747/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.18747","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:24:29.709549+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.18747v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:24:29.709549+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.18747","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:24:29.709549+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TAVOFMZGZ4IS","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:24:29.709549+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:24:29.709549+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TAVOFMZG","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:24:29.709549+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":6,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.05005","citing_title":"Neutrino mass constraints in interacting dark energy models after DESI DR2","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.01226","citing_title":"Intertwined Constraints in Extended Cosmologies: Dark Energy, Curvature, Neutrinos, and Inflation","ref_index":133,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.08876","citing_title":"DESI Dark Secrets","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.03779","citing_title":"Beyond CPL: Evidence for dynamical dark energy in three-parameter models","ref_index":28,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2602.19118","citing_title":"Exponential Quintessence Model: Analytical Quantification of the Fine-Tuning Problem in Dark Energy","ref_index":36,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.05122","citing_title":"Exponential Quintessence: Analytic Relationship Between the Current Equation of State Parameter and the Potential Parameter","ref_index":39,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TAVOFMZG"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TAVOFMZG","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.18747&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TAVOFMZGZ4ISBDNJN6BMD7GCT2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:24:29.709549+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:24:29.709549+00:00"}