{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA","short_pith_number":"pith:TB6CV6BO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"987c2af82e61389c662971e52c06b4803f31ea1f7785ac3a148dec99a99e879f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2401.02824","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Nuclear mass predictions using machine learning models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"nucl-th","authors_text":"Derya Soydaner, Esra Y\\\"uksel, H\\\"useyin Bahtiyar","submitted_at":"2024-01-05T14:16:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"The exploration of nuclear mass or binding energy, a fundamental property of atomic nuclei, remains at the forefront of nuclear physics research due to limitations in experimental studies and uncertainties in model calculations, particularly when moving away from the stability line. In this work, we employ two machine learning (ML) models, Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), to assess their performance in predicting nuclear mass excesses using available experimental data and a physics-based feature space. We also examine the extrapolation capabilities of thes"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2401.02824","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"nucl-th","submitted_at":"2024-01-05T14:16:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"89b8f49d57d66dd274eee7a0bf97bd9a96c62dff76e1894f5c8e781458227f3a","abstract_canon_sha256":"775e4605cd84bebdb966cd4f641f2d7878614d53d563225351e6ca93ceb11a01"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:21.491092Z","signature_b64":"iQdGaAHtxsAXZUIizGGb1Dpoxbp/yog0VKlYpIihdifla+YL4RTgIcP0AN5y8Fe6Ov0Snif9ND1sqcX4nKgzCg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"987c2af82e61389c662971e52c06b4803f31ea1f7785ac3a148dec99a99e879f","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:21.490655Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:21.490655Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Nuclear mass predictions using machine learning models","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"nucl-th","authors_text":"Derya Soydaner, Esra Y\\\"uksel, H\\\"useyin Bahtiyar","submitted_at":"2024-01-05T14:16:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"The exploration of nuclear mass or binding energy, a fundamental property of atomic nuclei, remains at the forefront of nuclear physics research due to limitations in experimental studies and uncertainties in model calculations, particularly when moving away from the stability line. In this work, we employ two machine learning (ML) models, Support Vector Regression (SVR) and Gaussian Process Regression (GPR), to assess their performance in predicting nuclear mass excesses using available experimental data and a physics-based feature space. We also examine the extrapolation capabilities of thes"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2401.02824","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2401.02824/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2401.02824","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:21.490718+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2401.02824v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:21.490718+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2401.02824","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:21.490718+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TB6CV6BOME4J","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:21.490718+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:21.490718+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TB6CV6BO","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:21.490718+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.06897","citing_title":"Machine learning the impact parameter in heavy-ion collisions at $\\sqrt{s_{\\rm NN}}$ = 4 and 11 GeV: a cross-check study with UrQMD, AMPT, and JAM","ref_index":34,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TB6CV6BO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TB6CV6BO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2401.02824&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TB6CV6BOME4JYZRJOHSSYBVUQA/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:21.490718+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:36:21.490718+00:00"}