{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS","short_pith_number":"pith:TCRFORDA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"98a25744604b469bad25cb0aa1957f448ca5b779202e81f14560a40d9dc1c756","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1908.02598","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DL"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Mirjam Aeschbach, Sven E. Hug","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Criteria are an essential component of any procedure for assessing merit. Yet, little is known about the criteria peers use in assessing grant applications. In this systematic review we therefore identify and synthesize studies that examine grant peer review criteria in an empirical and inductive manner. To facilitate the synthesis, we introduce a framework that classifies what is generally referred to as 'criterion' into an evaluated entity (i.e. the object of evaluation) and an evaluation criterion (i.e. the dimension along which an entity is evaluated). In total, this synthesis includes 12 "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1908.02598","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CY","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.DL"],"title_canon_sha256":"a2d8db09002a0766533f7c9cf95f47e04e1639359a372405d0b344b7137d6565","abstract_canon_sha256":"e6940ae6116a84231caf131eb8ecadd5a4e2f741e2579c0f9bfc521ebe81b133"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:27.187336Z","signature_b64":"9kYCybmcdbbHy92beab5jMonGIql6Z4iQOClI78Ml5CQ4VBiH29yNs2JErlLGJ4G3PXyHJuCbSLiixPCZ05VBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"98a25744604b469bad25cb0aa1957f448ca5b779202e81f14560a40d9dc1c756","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:27.186889Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:27.186889Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Criteria for assessing grant applications: A systematic review","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.DL"],"primary_cat":"cs.CY","authors_text":"Mirjam Aeschbach, Sven E. Hug","submitted_at":"2019-08-04T16:22:41Z","abstract_excerpt":"Criteria are an essential component of any procedure for assessing merit. Yet, little is known about the criteria peers use in assessing grant applications. In this systematic review we therefore identify and synthesize studies that examine grant peer review criteria in an empirical and inductive manner. To facilitate the synthesis, we introduce a framework that classifies what is generally referred to as 'criterion' into an evaluated entity (i.e. the object of evaluation) and an evaluation criterion (i.e. the dimension along which an entity is evaluated). In total, this synthesis includes 12 "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1908.02598","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1908.02598/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1908.02598","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:27.186952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1908.02598v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:27.186952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1908.02598","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:27.186952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TCRFORDAJNDJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:27.186952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TCRFORDAJNDJXLJF","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:27.186952+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TCRFORDA","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:27.186952+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TCRFORDA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TCRFORDA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1908.02598&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRFORDAJNDJXLJFZMFKDFL7IS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:27.186952+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:47:27.186952+00:00"}