{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T","short_pith_number":"pith:TCRYOGNX","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"98a38719b74ae61086ff687d2473cee4cfa901bcffd3dba70fb6d84dbe11328e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.11736","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chhavi Kirtani, Dhruv Kumar, Madhav Krishan Garg, Murari Mandal, Tanmay Singhal, Tejash Prasad","submitted_at":"2025-02-17T12:22:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"The escalating volume of academic research, coupled with a shortage of qualified reviewers, necessitates innovative approaches to peer review. In this work, we propose: 1. ReviewEval, a comprehensive evaluation framework for AI-generated reviews that measures alignment with human assessments, verifies factual accuracy, assesses analytical depth, identifies degree of constructiveness and adherence to reviewer guidelines; and 2. ReviewAgent, an LLM-based review generation agent featuring a novel alignment mechanism to tailor feedback to target conferences and journals, along with a self-refineme"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.11736","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-02-17T12:22:11Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"06bdf80a433c2e56c19e5670225cd4dcafc5b98462726d3e6f1d53235f3a3700","abstract_canon_sha256":"70734e0db9943d3ff6e4cdcf9b68012865cd9cbf05bea5b6cbac7d1b3a964cfa"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:08.623972Z","signature_b64":"YG4xugvKTU1CrO0yURZfj3pzvxMmO+HSAnzuExzKBKiqMnbt7L1R38/GHPpojuAl6wuQ74Ou5gWfpoWr/zOjAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"98a38719b74ae61086ff687d2473cee4cfa901bcffd3dba70fb6d84dbe11328e","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:08.623516Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:08.623516Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"ReviewEval: An Evaluation Framework for AI-Generated Reviews","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Chhavi Kirtani, Dhruv Kumar, Madhav Krishan Garg, Murari Mandal, Tanmay Singhal, Tejash Prasad","submitted_at":"2025-02-17T12:22:11Z","abstract_excerpt":"The escalating volume of academic research, coupled with a shortage of qualified reviewers, necessitates innovative approaches to peer review. In this work, we propose: 1. ReviewEval, a comprehensive evaluation framework for AI-generated reviews that measures alignment with human assessments, verifies factual accuracy, assesses analytical depth, identifies degree of constructiveness and adherence to reviewer guidelines; and 2. ReviewAgent, an LLM-based review generation agent featuring a novel alignment mechanism to tailor feedback to target conferences and journals, along with a self-refineme"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.11736","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.11736/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.11736","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:08.623573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.11736v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:08.623573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.11736","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:08.623573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TCRYOGNXJLTB","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:08.623573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:08.623573+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TCRYOGNX","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:08.623573+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.27204","citing_title":"GraphReview: Scientific Paper Evaluation via LLM-Based Graph Message Passing","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19578","citing_title":"Impact of large language models on peer review opinions from a fine-grained perspective: Evidence from top conference proceedings in AI","ref_index":33,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TCRYOGNX"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TCRYOGNX","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.11736&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TCRYOGNXJLTBBBX7NB6SI46O4T/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:08.623573+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:09:08.623573+00:00"}