{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP","short_pith_number":"pith:TDKZRLY4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"98d598af1c2092c7308f8d1c5fe07c7bc04d350f6f5320f2fee33e7bc2990ef0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2602.15198","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Colosseum: Auditing Collusion in Cooperative Multi-Agent Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Abhinav Kumar, Eugene Bagdasarian, Ferdinando Fioretto, Mason Nakamura, Saaduddin Mahmud, Sahar Abdelnabi, Saswat Das, Shlomo Zilberstein","submitted_at":"2026-02-16T21:27:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Multi-agent systems, where LLM agents communicate through free-form language, enable sophisticated coordination for solving complex cooperative tasks. This surfaces a unique safety problem when a group of agents forms a coalition and colludes to pursue secondary goals and degrade the joint objective. In this paper, we present Colosseum, a framework for auditing LLM agents' collusive behavior in multi-agent settings. We ground how agents cooperate through a formal multi-agent decision-making framework and measure action-based collusive behavior in actions via regret relative to the cooperative "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2602.15198","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.MA","submitted_at":"2026-02-16T21:27:38Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CL"],"title_canon_sha256":"b7a19c9ddbc9113ad9ed4ecd1bd7a0f9e508aade386484dc2c4661edae5aa966","abstract_canon_sha256":"0eff22fc05b2bb24616710f63ce6cf0788b6d1c6fc28ee8c7791d42a3ac2d14f"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:37.068080Z","signature_b64":"SUy+ivPoqHj6PJJJfCU4F7W3zxI9EFVD91hN8DgWX1E5LoeRTmyzyuvAtsnO9EFW14+VC7YZ07lz/dmjIET5Aw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"98d598af1c2092c7308f8d1c5fe07c7bc04d350f6f5320f2fee33e7bc2990ef0","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:37.067568Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:37.067568Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Colosseum: Auditing Collusion in Cooperative Multi-Agent Systems","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CL"],"primary_cat":"cs.MA","authors_text":"Abhinav Kumar, Eugene Bagdasarian, Ferdinando Fioretto, Mason Nakamura, Saaduddin Mahmud, Sahar Abdelnabi, Saswat Das, Shlomo Zilberstein","submitted_at":"2026-02-16T21:27:38Z","abstract_excerpt":"Multi-agent systems, where LLM agents communicate through free-form language, enable sophisticated coordination for solving complex cooperative tasks. This surfaces a unique safety problem when a group of agents forms a coalition and colludes to pursue secondary goals and degrade the joint objective. In this paper, we present Colosseum, a framework for auditing LLM agents' collusive behavior in multi-agent settings. We ground how agents cooperate through a formal multi-agent decision-making framework and measure action-based collusive behavior in actions via regret relative to the cooperative "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2602.15198","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2602.15198/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2602.15198","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:37.067634+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2602.15198v2","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:37.067634+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2602.15198","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:37.067634+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TDKZRLY4ECJM","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:37.067634+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEP","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:37.067634+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TDKZRLY4","created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:37.067634+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":5,"internal_anchor_count":5,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.16282","citing_title":"Taxonomy and Consistency Analysis of Safety Benchmarks for AI Agents","ref_index":40,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.01151","citing_title":"Detecting Multi-Agent Collusion Through Multi-Agent Interpretability","ref_index":16,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.10481","citing_title":"Safe Multi-Agent Behavior Must Be Maintained, Not Merely Asserted: Constraint Drift in LLM-Based Multi-Agent Systems","ref_index":26,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23511","citing_title":"Breaking the Secret: Economic Interventions for Combating Collusion in Embodied Multi-Agent Systems","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.23338","citing_title":"A Systematic Survey of Security Threats and Defenses in LLM-Based AI Agents: A Layered Attack Surface Framework","ref_index":51,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TDKZRLY4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TDKZRLY4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2602.15198&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TDKZRLY4ECJMOMEPRUOF7YD4PP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:37.067634+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-28T01:04:37.067634+00:00"}