{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM","short_pith_number":"pith:TFPARUPJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"995e08d1e93481b2d719067f972ee4331620ced82b98d12c3df4c18594e15c85","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2112.00832","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"On the mixed-model analysis of covariance in cluster-randomized trials","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Bingkai Wang, Dylan S. Small, Fan Li, Jiaqi Tong, Michael O. Harhay, Tim P. Morris","submitted_at":"2021-12-01T21:19:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the analyses of cluster-randomized trials, mixed-model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is a standard approach for covariate adjustment and handling within-cluster correlations. However, when the normality, linearity, or the random-intercept assumption is violated, the validity and efficiency of the mixed-model ANCOVA estimators for estimating the average treatment effect remain unclear. Under the potential outcomes framework, we prove that the mixed-model ANCOVA estimators for the average treatment effect are consistent and asymptotically normal under arbitrary misspecification of its worki"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2112.00832","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2021-12-01T21:19:27Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"62889039a8719602844acf3db3e972a9728d458d61a01a813c11cd88e956b16c","abstract_canon_sha256":"861b322242f64588fc8912a6f6f44f21b9f1a65cada5ed4cb09695a46ab8f2aa"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:35.293994Z","signature_b64":"r9tg2Zw3t8ZAQj0vgtRgaMeVKi1gFHdoKP34j+WgaPrC0n17o8YsEZC0we+jqgjcc6eQNtXEpjc638Oef4BYCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"995e08d1e93481b2d719067f972ee4331620ced82b98d12c3df4c18594e15c85","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:35.293570Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:35.293570Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"On the mixed-model analysis of covariance in cluster-randomized trials","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Bingkai Wang, Dylan S. Small, Fan Li, Jiaqi Tong, Michael O. Harhay, Tim P. Morris","submitted_at":"2021-12-01T21:19:27Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the analyses of cluster-randomized trials, mixed-model analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) is a standard approach for covariate adjustment and handling within-cluster correlations. However, when the normality, linearity, or the random-intercept assumption is violated, the validity and efficiency of the mixed-model ANCOVA estimators for estimating the average treatment effect remain unclear. Under the potential outcomes framework, we prove that the mixed-model ANCOVA estimators for the average treatment effect are consistent and asymptotically normal under arbitrary misspecification of its worki"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2112.00832","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2112.00832/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2112.00832","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:35.293632+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2112.00832v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:35.293632+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2112.00832","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:35.293632+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TFPARUPJGSA3","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:35.293632+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:35.293632+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TFPARUPJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:35.293632+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2406.02834","citing_title":"Asymptotic inference with flexible covariate adjustment under rerandomization and stratified rerandomization","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TFPARUPJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TFPARUPJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2112.00832&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TFPARUPJGSA3FVYZAZ7ZOLXEGM/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:35.293632+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:58:35.293632+00:00"}