{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2021:TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW","short_pith_number":"pith:TGJU2ZJM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"99934d652ce14437ff268b53303a8f958928a2cfc986a09920b0258fb405c696","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2103.05633","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Proof-of-Learning: Definitions and Practice","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CR","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Anvith Thudi, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Hengrui Jia, Mohammad Yaghini, Natalie Dullerud, Nicolas Papernot, Varun Chandrasekaran","submitted_at":"2021-03-09T18:59:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Training machine learning (ML) models typically involves expensive iterative optimization. Once the model's final parameters are released, there is currently no mechanism for the entity which trained the model to prove that these parameters were indeed the result of this optimization procedure. Such a mechanism would support security of ML applications in several ways. For instance, it would simplify ownership resolution when multiple parties contest ownership of a specific model. It would also facilitate the distributed training across untrusted workers where Byzantine workers might otherwise"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2103.05633","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2021-03-09T18:59:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CR","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"251c7cd370d0555cfcb45878a023a53f4ce0d801dac494f755bc13586e22b313","abstract_canon_sha256":"d78814dc2e8fb0e1500d6cde58511a19141671d9034b01dab562fa0fb1b6ebda"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:48.393893Z","signature_b64":"6Jf2KbmeYT66J5ynYe/W31X395gCcu7QfpaNZ5R98aHcXNhr4xVPTG+degCn1aIfe3Vel2VnllwFrPwToxI2DQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"99934d652ce14437ff268b53303a8f958928a2cfc986a09920b0258fb405c696","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:48.393476Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:48.393476Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Proof-of-Learning: Definitions and Practice","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CR","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Anvith Thudi, Christopher A. Choquette-Choo, Hengrui Jia, Mohammad Yaghini, Natalie Dullerud, Nicolas Papernot, Varun Chandrasekaran","submitted_at":"2021-03-09T18:59:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Training machine learning (ML) models typically involves expensive iterative optimization. Once the model's final parameters are released, there is currently no mechanism for the entity which trained the model to prove that these parameters were indeed the result of this optimization procedure. Such a mechanism would support security of ML applications in several ways. For instance, it would simplify ownership resolution when multiple parties contest ownership of a specific model. It would also facilitate the distributed training across untrusted workers where Byzantine workers might otherwise"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2103.05633","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2103.05633/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2103.05633","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:48.393539+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2103.05633v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:48.393539+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2103.05633","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:48.393539+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TGJU2ZJM4FCD","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:48.393539+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZG","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:48.393539+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TGJU2ZJM","created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:48.393539+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.09401","citing_title":"Benchmarking Empirical Privacy Protection for Adaptations of Large Language Models","ref_index":99,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.28386","citing_title":"Data Provenance for Image Auto-Regressive Generation","ref_index":78,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TGJU2ZJM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TGJU2ZJM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2103.05633&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TGJU2ZJM4FCDP7ZGRNJTAOUPSW/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:48.393539+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T02:21:48.393539+00:00"}