{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J","short_pith_number":"pith:TPVGBTSA","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9bea60ce40ad76854815c22b50b060da6616f43f4c8a08b28ed77065b8e5c34f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1707.00046","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Fairer and more accurate, but for whom?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Alexandra Chouldechova, Max G'Sell","submitted_at":"2017-06-30T21:07:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Complex statistical machine learning models are increasingly being used or considered for use in high-stakes decision-making pipelines in domains such as financial services, health care, criminal justice and human services. These models are often investigated as possible improvements over more classical tools such as regression models or human judgement. While the modeling approach may be new, the practice of using some form of risk assessment to inform decisions is not. When determining whether a new model should be adopted, it is therefore essential to be able to compare the proposed model t"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1707.00046","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.AP","submitted_at":"2017-06-30T21:07:09Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"d874e82e7713477a5cadbbd1382a464ee60cf63606bcb167e282383a726d1582","abstract_canon_sha256":"877cd76ba244349b06c96f945f8e7e3d5191c0fdbb188c0d4d2f1d122ad0ed03"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:41:08.731891Z","signature_b64":"h7Awuz/5zXFmRBt7pY7DkRbuOfBStUBqk4W6BnKOVkX7YHmlRuKEk+Oym478oM8sjlWQch3ju9Zd59UYSp4CCA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9bea60ce40ad76854815c22b50b060da6616f43f4c8a08b28ed77065b8e5c34f","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:41:08.731354Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:41:08.731354Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Fairer and more accurate, but for whom?","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"stat.AP","authors_text":"Alexandra Chouldechova, Max G'Sell","submitted_at":"2017-06-30T21:07:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Complex statistical machine learning models are increasingly being used or considered for use in high-stakes decision-making pipelines in domains such as financial services, health care, criminal justice and human services. These models are often investigated as possible improvements over more classical tools such as regression models or human judgement. While the modeling approach may be new, the practice of using some form of risk assessment to inform decisions is not. When determining whether a new model should be adopted, it is therefore essential to be able to compare the proposed model t"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1707.00046","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1707.00046","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:41:08.731421+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1707.00046v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:41:08.731421+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1707.00046","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:41:08.731421+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TPVGBTSAVV3I","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:46.661854+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:46.661854+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TPVGBTSA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:46.661854+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.19357","citing_title":"FairTree: Subgroup Fairness Auditing of Machine Learning Models with Bias-Variance Decomposition","ref_index":4,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TPVGBTSA"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TPVGBTSA","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1707.00046&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TPVGBTSAVV3IKSAVYIVVBMDA3J/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:41:08.731421+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:41:08.731421+00:00"}