{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ","short_pith_number":"pith:TPYQRU4J","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9bf108d389111486411205af2ff19fa246294e79265b24c18fcb99eafe470e82","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.10877","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Covariate adjustment in randomized experiments with missing outcomes and covariates","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Anqi Zhao, Fan Li, Peng Ding","submitted_at":"2023-11-17T21:37:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"Covariate adjustment can improve precision in analyzing randomized experiments. With fully observed data, regression adjustment and propensity score weighting are asymptotically equivalent in improving efficiency over unadjusted analysis. When some outcomes are missing, we consider combining these two adjustment methods with inverse probability of observation weighting for handling missing outcomes, and show that the equivalence between the two methods breaks down. Regression adjustment no longer ensures efficiency gain over unadjusted analysis unless the true outcome model is linear in covari"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.10877","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2023-11-17T21:37:00Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"108f3547c0801c3c2d4eee68655ce5227b8fffeb40585ba79b0018d04edfa9b4","abstract_canon_sha256":"d2aeed6f0e0255afa2361d0b46e70d632192dbb717e6ffff21550f0d3d1c99b9"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:14.018096Z","signature_b64":"MRbmNc1T44/b+qv7Qt2rJY/CCvxzn/3iErLlcEJxY3PpFosmy8I7MupzdYALqHZUckLXA9UCljTKG7WsQsnMAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9bf108d389111486411205af2ff19fa246294e79265b24c18fcb99eafe470e82","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:14.017620Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:14.017620Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Covariate adjustment in randomized experiments with missing outcomes and covariates","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Anqi Zhao, Fan Li, Peng Ding","submitted_at":"2023-11-17T21:37:00Z","abstract_excerpt":"Covariate adjustment can improve precision in analyzing randomized experiments. With fully observed data, regression adjustment and propensity score weighting are asymptotically equivalent in improving efficiency over unadjusted analysis. When some outcomes are missing, we consider combining these two adjustment methods with inverse probability of observation weighting for handling missing outcomes, and show that the equivalence between the two methods breaks down. Regression adjustment no longer ensures efficiency gain over unadjusted analysis unless the true outcome model is linear in covari"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.10877","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.10877/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.10877","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:14.017678+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.10877v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:14.017678+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.10877","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:14.017678+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TPYQRU4JCEKI","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:14.017678+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TPYQRU4JCEKIMQIS","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:14.017678+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TPYQRU4J","created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:14.017678+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.09536","citing_title":"Misspecified regressions with mixed regressors: robust inference and causal interpretation","ref_index":73,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TPYQRU4J"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TPYQRU4J","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.10877&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TPYQRU4JCEKIMQISAWXS74M7UJ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:14.017678+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T07:52:14.017678+00:00"}