{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2014:TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB","short_pith_number":"pith:TQ4LNU45","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9c38b6d39d8e0a02e982adcfd8afd82047c6e56c16655199b7b12d5a328eae74","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1407.0178","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Polarization measurements analysis II. Best estimators of polarization fraction and angle","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.IM","authors_text":"D. Alina, F. Levrier, I. Ristorcelli, J.-P. Bernard, L. Montier, M. Tristram, S. Plaszczynski, V. Guillet","submitted_at":"2014-07-01T10:42:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the forthcoming release of high precision polarization measurements, such as from the Planck satellite, it becomes critical to evaluate the performance of estimators for the polarization fraction and angle. These two physical quantities suffer from a well-known bias in the presence of measurement noise, as has been described in part I of this series. In this paper, part II of the series, we explore the extent to which various estimators may correct the bias. Traditional frequentist estimators of the polarization fraction are compared with two recent estimators: one inspired by a Bayesian "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1407.0178","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.IM","submitted_at":"2014-07-01T10:42:48Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"a76731788058567be1d6d1910a928bec56063dc46b6008a9df7764b2ed6c14ea","abstract_canon_sha256":"32cad96aac9726f5b931b5e9d5d830cee26f89eb27acd1dc2e6b8ce808bd7233"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:27:32.340172Z","signature_b64":"dhBo4nAQT3Ufa28iLQ+PiQEMIAOLuOFNwF6OvAuaAUZriDywwMiKbUIL9vl598RpYbnNi4oCtGm9xU77jJopDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9c38b6d39d8e0a02e982adcfd8afd82047c6e56c16655199b7b12d5a328eae74","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:27:32.339362Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:27:32.339362Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Polarization measurements analysis II. Best estimators of polarization fraction and angle","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.IM","authors_text":"D. Alina, F. Levrier, I. Ristorcelli, J.-P. Bernard, L. Montier, M. Tristram, S. Plaszczynski, V. Guillet","submitted_at":"2014-07-01T10:42:48Z","abstract_excerpt":"With the forthcoming release of high precision polarization measurements, such as from the Planck satellite, it becomes critical to evaluate the performance of estimators for the polarization fraction and angle. These two physical quantities suffer from a well-known bias in the presence of measurement noise, as has been described in part I of this series. In this paper, part II of the series, we explore the extent to which various estimators may correct the bias. Traditional frequentist estimators of the polarization fraction are compared with two recent estimators: one inspired by a Bayesian "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1407.0178","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1407.0178","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:27:32.339499+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1407.0178v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:27:32.339499+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1407.0178","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:27:32.339499+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TQ4LNU45RYFA","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:49.207871+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MC","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:49.207871+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TQ4LNU45","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:49.207871+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TQ4LNU45"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TQ4LNU45","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1407.0178&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TQ4LNU45RYFAF2MCVXH5RL6YEB/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:27:32.339499+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T02:27:32.339499+00:00"}