{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ","short_pith_number":"pith:TSMVHCR6","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9c99538a3e4e60aeb7061e1c8036f66e50fb5ac14e4164096f2d308981f577bf","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2207.12796","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Secure Internet Exams Despite Coercion","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Gabriele Lenzini, Mohammadamin Rakeei, Rosario Giustolisi","submitted_at":"2022-07-26T10:30:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study coercion-resistance for online exams. We propose two properties, Anonymous Submission and Single-Blindness which, if hold, preserve the anonymity of the links between tests, test takers, and examiners even when the parties coerce one another into revealing secrets. The properties are relevant: not even Remark!, a secure exam protocol that satisfied anonymous marking and anonymous examiners results to be coercion resistant. Then, we propose a coercion-resistance protocol which satisfies, in addition to known anonymity properties, the two novel properties we have introduced. We prove ou"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2207.12796","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CR","submitted_at":"2022-07-26T10:30:22Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"09b71ce9429017761365edd4aa4cc3990029eeffcc7cf7eea5c36ed7929e726f","abstract_canon_sha256":"0c8d1855817bc23e6efd3c56fb526b928a188a77d41f8b3122b969db590b3075"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T04:43:26.402193Z","signature_b64":"bzHKv4RiHYXgqvz69rqjtIOo/9zN8oWrbs9POpHwdzUzOr1bQuPTD8BA0lWPqfz/pbV207hePmnlhRdDIwF0AQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9c99538a3e4e60aeb7061e1c8036f66e50fb5ac14e4164096f2d308981f577bf","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T04:43:26.401845Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T04:43:26.401845Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Secure Internet Exams Despite Coercion","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CR","authors_text":"Gabriele Lenzini, Mohammadamin Rakeei, Rosario Giustolisi","submitted_at":"2022-07-26T10:30:22Z","abstract_excerpt":"We study coercion-resistance for online exams. We propose two properties, Anonymous Submission and Single-Blindness which, if hold, preserve the anonymity of the links between tests, test takers, and examiners even when the parties coerce one another into revealing secrets. The properties are relevant: not even Remark!, a secure exam protocol that satisfied anonymous marking and anonymous examiners results to be coercion resistant. Then, we propose a coercion-resistance protocol which satisfies, in addition to known anonymity properties, the two novel properties we have introduced. We prove ou"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2207.12796","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2207.12796/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2207.12796","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:43:26.401901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2207.12796v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:43:26.401901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2207.12796","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:43:26.401901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TSMVHCR6JZQK","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:43:26.401901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYG","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:43:26.401901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TSMVHCR6","created_at":"2026-07-05T04:43:26.401901+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.12088","citing_title":"Risks & Benefits of LLMs & GenAI for Platform Integrity, Healthcare Diagnostics, Financial Trust and Compliance, Cybersecurity, Privacy & AI Safety: A Comprehensive Survey, Roadmap & Implementation Bl","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TSMVHCR6"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TSMVHCR6","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2207.12796&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TSMVHCR6JZQK5NYGDYOIANXWNZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T04:43:26.401901+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T04:43:26.401901+00:00"}