{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2013:TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O","short_pith_number":"pith:TTATVKTM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9cc13aaa6c1693f56bbf0d428e4acee39a96d57acf7825c1f6397f11a8eed7b7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1302.7142","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Holonomy Operator and Quantization Ambiguities on Spinor Space","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math-ph","math.MP"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Etera R. Livine, Johannes Tambornino","submitted_at":"2013-02-28T10:31:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"We construct the holonomy-flux operator algebra in the recently developed spinor formulation of loop gravity. We show that, when restricting to SU(2)-gauge invariant operators, the familiar grasping and Wilson loop operators are written as composite operators built from the gauge-invariant `generalized ladder operators' recently introduced in the U(N) approach to intertwiners and spin networks. We comment on quantization ambiguities that appear in the definition of the holonomy operator and use these ambiguities as a toy model to test a class of quantization ambiguities which is present in the"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1302.7142","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"gr-qc","submitted_at":"2013-02-28T10:31:06Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math-ph","math.MP"],"title_canon_sha256":"74d2ac06d0b10cd88106e11861e0a874135254588f0ac929f66db5564a53c37c","abstract_canon_sha256":"924af2ef829c66e2c21660047a67c2d290c8c90b4aa1839fedd4cb80b3f25ab8"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:07:44.416538Z","signature_b64":"WyMcye/mCNkxjcpgPYzaPKJxqLCk+DtCDe8SE9UqxH23i8h+lVXwjxf9v76Pawmg/07Yf3rN7h7/md5DmndfAw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9cc13aaa6c1693f56bbf0d428e4acee39a96d57acf7825c1f6397f11a8eed7b7","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:07:44.415891Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:07:44.415891Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Holonomy Operator and Quantization Ambiguities on Spinor Space","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["math-ph","math.MP"],"primary_cat":"gr-qc","authors_text":"Etera R. Livine, Johannes Tambornino","submitted_at":"2013-02-28T10:31:06Z","abstract_excerpt":"We construct the holonomy-flux operator algebra in the recently developed spinor formulation of loop gravity. We show that, when restricting to SU(2)-gauge invariant operators, the familiar grasping and Wilson loop operators are written as composite operators built from the gauge-invariant `generalized ladder operators' recently introduced in the U(N) approach to intertwiners and spin networks. We comment on quantization ambiguities that appear in the definition of the holonomy operator and use these ambiguities as a toy model to test a class of quantization ambiguities which is present in the"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1302.7142","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1302.7142","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:07:44.415984+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1302.7142v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:07:44.415984+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1302.7142","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:07:44.415984+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TTATVKTMC2J7","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:02.375192+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TTATVKTMC2J7K257","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:02.375192+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TTATVKTM","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:02.375192+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.06572","citing_title":"Area bounds and gauge fixing: alternative canonical variables for loop gravity","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TTATVKTM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TTATVKTM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1302.7142&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TTATVKTMC2J7K257BVBI4SWO4O/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:07:44.415984+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:07:44.415984+00:00"}