{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG","short_pith_number":"pith:TWWECIWU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9dac4122d466e789884613bfcd27d6498a5125345e6188946f260d43bf5b69e7","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.16119","version":5},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Determination of Strong Coupling Constant from Inclusive Semileptonic Decays of Charmed Mesons","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Gang Li, Jinfei Wu, Jingbo Ye, Manqi Ruan, Xinchou Lou, Yanping Huang, Yuzhi Che","submitted_at":"2024-06-23T14:20:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Employing the heavy quark expansion model with the kinetic scheme, we evaluate $\\alpha_S(m_c^2)$, the strong coupling constant at the charm quark mass $m_c$ with data on inclusive semileptonic decays of charmed mesons. Using the experimental values of semileptonic decay widths of the $D^0$ and the $D^+$, the value of $\\alpha_{s}(m_c^{2})$ is determined to be $0.445\\pm0.009\\pm0.114$, where the first uncertainty is experimental and the second systematic. This reported $\\alpha_{s}(m_c^{2})$ is in good agreement with the value of $\\alpha_{s}(m_c^{2})$ calculated by running $\\alpha_S(m_Z^2)$ at the"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.16119","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"hep-ph","submitted_at":"2024-06-23T14:20:43Z","cross_cats_sorted":["hep-ex"],"title_canon_sha256":"e84cd59c588af4cf9f634552637bc7ae43d414a40359eef1a8386a393a73ee48","abstract_canon_sha256":"236e1f51f7c70703c23d1ea6bf3423f4d4ef896594c62caba9a67609b090ef6b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:47.698140Z","signature_b64":"Hfw1F/zHKGbvz9H9qrjwhcFBYaGP6BU3DD+W/2jtveGzVe3bWxFvrilMqr3FYjwObvBY7OfIt/gD34ahz39JBA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9dac4122d466e789884613bfcd27d6498a5125345e6188946f260d43bf5b69e7","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:47.697669Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:47.697669Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Determination of Strong Coupling Constant from Inclusive Semileptonic Decays of Charmed Mesons","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["hep-ex"],"primary_cat":"hep-ph","authors_text":"Gang Li, Jinfei Wu, Jingbo Ye, Manqi Ruan, Xinchou Lou, Yanping Huang, Yuzhi Che","submitted_at":"2024-06-23T14:20:43Z","abstract_excerpt":"Employing the heavy quark expansion model with the kinetic scheme, we evaluate $\\alpha_S(m_c^2)$, the strong coupling constant at the charm quark mass $m_c$ with data on inclusive semileptonic decays of charmed mesons. Using the experimental values of semileptonic decay widths of the $D^0$ and the $D^+$, the value of $\\alpha_{s}(m_c^{2})$ is determined to be $0.445\\pm0.009\\pm0.114$, where the first uncertainty is experimental and the second systematic. This reported $\\alpha_{s}(m_c^{2})$ is in good agreement with the value of $\\alpha_{s}(m_c^{2})$ calculated by running $\\alpha_S(m_Z^2)$ at the"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.16119","kind":"arxiv","version":5},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.16119/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.16119","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:47.697727+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.16119v5","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:47.697727+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.16119","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:47.697727+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TWWECIWUM3TY","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:47.697727+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TWWECIWUM3TYTCCG","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:47.697727+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TWWECIWU","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:47.697727+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.05901","citing_title":"Data determination of HQET parameters in inclusive charm decays","ref_index":30,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TWWECIWU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TWWECIWU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.16119&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TWWECIWUM3TYTCCGCO742J6WJG/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:47.697727+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:17:47.697727+00:00"}