{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU","short_pith_number":"pith:TXR76YVU","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9de3ff62b409a0d0520de64412f228453f3b9e55f2da886a2bab47a9d2b25440","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2505.03989","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"An alignment safety case sketch based on debate","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Benjamin Hilton, Geoffrey Irving, Jacob Pfau, Marie Davidsen Buhl","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T21:53:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"If AI systems match or exceed human capabilities on a wide range of tasks, it may become difficult for humans to efficiently judge their actions -- making it hard to use human feedback to steer them towards desirable traits. One proposed solution is to leverage another superhuman system to point out flaws in the system's outputs via a debate. This paper outlines the value of debate for AI safety, as well as the assumptions and further research required to make debate work. It does so by sketching an ``alignment safety case'' -- an argument that an AI system will not autonomously take actions w"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2505.03989","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T21:53:44Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"b5786c25233a31f2024e6b9ee3e0327e64be91ff8960c76e0d50f129dc4b75f2","abstract_canon_sha256":"14004e7c8abbc310f6bc3a78b354a9bfda525aac059f7ac90ccc6b07a6bd0c4d"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:20.063097Z","signature_b64":"/t2vMQehXskAnPFFHnVdLwiz0A8NO+UqcCy8nj63LiZi6QCEffcEPGXP4Qxy8b6e+BVtvcuq0tAitt+R81L1Aw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9de3ff62b409a0d0520de64412f228453f3b9e55f2da886a2bab47a9d2b25440","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:20.062626Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:20.062626Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"An alignment safety case sketch based on debate","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Benjamin Hilton, Geoffrey Irving, Jacob Pfau, Marie Davidsen Buhl","submitted_at":"2025-05-06T21:53:44Z","abstract_excerpt":"If AI systems match or exceed human capabilities on a wide range of tasks, it may become difficult for humans to efficiently judge their actions -- making it hard to use human feedback to steer them towards desirable traits. One proposed solution is to leverage another superhuman system to point out flaws in the system's outputs via a debate. This paper outlines the value of debate for AI safety, as well as the assumptions and further research required to make debate work. It does so by sketching an ``alignment safety case'' -- an argument that an AI system will not autonomously take actions w"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2505.03989","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2505.03989/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2505.03989","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:20.062677+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2505.03989v3","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:20.062677+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2505.03989","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:20.062677+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TXR76YVUBGQN","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:20.062677+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:20.062677+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TXR76YVU","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:20.062677+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TXR76YVU"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TXR76YVU","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2505.03989&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TXR76YVUBGQNAUQN4ZCBF4RIIU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:20.062677+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:08:20.062677+00:00"}