{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2017:TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774","short_pith_number":"pith:TYOEIFHM","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9e1c4414ec1d744fcecb56490a8fbfff1d0b0fa44a791d43855fb9cc32c2ea7e","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1705.00506","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Paradoxes in instrumental variable studies with missing data and one-sided noncompliance","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Dylan S. Small, Edward H. Kennedy","submitted_at":"2017-05-01T13:19:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is common in instrumental variable studies for instrument values to be missing, for example when the instrument is a genetic test in Mendelian randomization studies. In this paper we discuss two apparent paradoxes that arise in so-called single consent designs where there is one-sided noncompliance, i.e., where unencouraged units cannot access treatment. The first paradox is that, even under a missing completely at random assumption, a complete-case analysis is biased when knowledge of one-sided noncompliance is taken into account; this is not the case when such information is disregarded. "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1705.00506","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ME","submitted_at":"2017-05-01T13:19:30Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"f23e1fa616b5a8e1cdbeacf096d6c9fab1eff89a5e9bb4e1df32af38baf7b4e0","abstract_canon_sha256":"6ee83e02dc6f83f4b66f969ed7a55a7e8fc4a3226110e3835181817249a6720b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T00:18:09.683242Z","signature_b64":"kxcjjg/q9igEKejLxq0ccmNjeCG2LMdnWi4pWsVmcezvq28h4RlFMROXPat485Vuf6YuPyNvFcNZbOWtxjAODw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9e1c4414ec1d744fcecb56490a8fbfff1d0b0fa44a791d43855fb9cc32c2ea7e","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T00:18:09.682565Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T00:18:09.682565Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Paradoxes in instrumental variable studies with missing data and one-sided noncompliance","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.ME","authors_text":"Dylan S. Small, Edward H. Kennedy","submitted_at":"2017-05-01T13:19:30Z","abstract_excerpt":"It is common in instrumental variable studies for instrument values to be missing, for example when the instrument is a genetic test in Mendelian randomization studies. In this paper we discuss two apparent paradoxes that arise in so-called single consent designs where there is one-sided noncompliance, i.e., where unencouraged units cannot access treatment. The first paradox is that, even under a missing completely at random assumption, a complete-case analysis is biased when knowledge of one-sided noncompliance is taken into account; this is not the case when such information is disregarded. "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1705.00506","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1705.00506","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:18:09.682662+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1705.00506v2","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:18:09.682662+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1705.00506","created_at":"2026-05-18T00:18:09.682662+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TYOEIFHMDV2E","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:46.661854+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWL","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:46.661854+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TYOEIFHM","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:31:46.661854+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TYOEIFHM"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TYOEIFHM","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1705.00506&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TYOEIFHMDV2E7TWLKZEQVD5774/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T00:18:09.682662+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T00:18:09.682662+00:00"}