{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2019:TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45","short_pith_number":"pith:TZMIP55J","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"9e5887f7a96584e12ca1b9a6f74a72e76548d6fa392b6e48ebf6c9f6e272e2db","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1906.00250","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Metric Learning for Individual Fairness","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Christina Ilvento","submitted_at":"2019-06-01T16:09:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"There has been much discussion recently about how fairness should be measured or enforced in classification. Individual Fairness [Dwork, Hardt, Pitassi, Reingold, Zemel, 2012], which requires that similar individuals be treated similarly, is a highly appealing definition as it gives strong guarantees on treatment of individuals. Unfortunately, the need for a task-specific similarity metric has prevented its use in practice. In this work, we propose a solution to the problem of approximating a metric for Individual Fairness based on human judgments. Our model assumes that we have access to a hu"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1906.00250","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2019-06-01T16:09:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.CY","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"764aedaf351ccf23bf6bcb1f78a17d8a561be6970a742bf7e77787bff9d5dc7c","abstract_canon_sha256":"754706822bc97a7627891e7277a3889247c15745c4bf0ad04fccf55897b7ca99"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T00:52:15.241352Z","signature_b64":"QBtrQf3crittHcnQ2fHwzGkTRxdsBtQsTjcP6BEPZWwAP7aaQYUORh60xu0TgbljT/QTelC15DSMdAOGhVkmDQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"9e5887f7a96584e12ca1b9a6f74a72e76548d6fa392b6e48ebf6c9f6e272e2db","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T00:52:15.240912Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T00:52:15.240912Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Metric Learning for Individual Fairness","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.CY","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Christina Ilvento","submitted_at":"2019-06-01T16:09:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"There has been much discussion recently about how fairness should be measured or enforced in classification. Individual Fairness [Dwork, Hardt, Pitassi, Reingold, Zemel, 2012], which requires that similar individuals be treated similarly, is a highly appealing definition as it gives strong guarantees on treatment of individuals. Unfortunately, the need for a task-specific similarity metric has prevented its use in practice. In this work, we propose a solution to the problem of approximating a metric for Individual Fairness based on human judgments. Our model assumes that we have access to a hu"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1906.00250","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/1906.00250/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1906.00250","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:52:15.240967+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1906.00250v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:52:15.240967+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1906.00250","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:52:15.240967+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"TZMIP55JMWCO","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:52:15.240967+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"TZMIP55JMWCOCLFB","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:52:15.240967+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"TZMIP55J","created_at":"2026-07-05T00:52:15.240967+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.12701","citing_title":"Do Fair Models Reason Fairly? Counterfactual Explanation Consistency for Procedural Fairness in Credit Decisions","ref_index":132,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.09852","citing_title":"Fairness of Explanations in Artificial Intelligence (AI): A Unifying Framework, Axioms, and Future Direction toward Responsible AI","ref_index":29,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45","json":"https://pith.science/pith/TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TZMIP55J"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/TZMIP55J","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1906.00250&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/TZMIP55JMWCOCLFBXGTPOSTS45/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T00:52:15.240967+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T00:52:15.240967+00:00"}