{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP","short_pith_number":"pith:U4TAMYFR","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a7260660b1b6960f5bcec683e755561bff717460f0945b0a3cf70a4f4817cab0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2409.01266","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Double Machine Learning meets Panel Data -- Promises, Pitfalls, and Potential Solutions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.ME","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Dominik Papies, Jonathan Fuhr","submitted_at":"2024-09-02T13:59:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Estimating causal effect using machine learning (ML) algorithms can help to relax functional form assumptions if used within appropriate frameworks. However, most of these frameworks assume settings with cross-sectional data, whereas researchers often have access to panel data, which in traditional methods helps to deal with unobserved heterogeneity between units. In this paper, we explore how we can adapt double/debiased machine learning (DML) (Chernozhukov et al., 2018) for panel data in the presence of unobserved heterogeneity. This adaptation is challenging because DML's cross-fitting proc"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2409.01266","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"econ.EM","submitted_at":"2024-09-02T13:59:54Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.LG","stat.ME","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"510be3888c62196a7c58284845e893eb2c68ca68187b60f014d7861238766ac6","abstract_canon_sha256":"d775ac1a824c6538152da7d7b95dba80308fdaa71b30f1936f6a63db70754865"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:26.920141Z","signature_b64":"K50VYV9JX09pUSdAJNW2sbeZUuMkTkEOZA7GlMJzYm0FQuIGbUfyQ2FCWKekU+IV7cnaVt0lItyObFSKCj5TBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a7260660b1b6960f5bcec683e755561bff717460f0945b0a3cf70a4f4817cab0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:26.919672Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:26.919672Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Double Machine Learning meets Panel Data -- Promises, Pitfalls, and Potential Solutions","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.LG","stat.ME","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Dominik Papies, Jonathan Fuhr","submitted_at":"2024-09-02T13:59:54Z","abstract_excerpt":"Estimating causal effect using machine learning (ML) algorithms can help to relax functional form assumptions if used within appropriate frameworks. However, most of these frameworks assume settings with cross-sectional data, whereas researchers often have access to panel data, which in traditional methods helps to deal with unobserved heterogeneity between units. In this paper, we explore how we can adapt double/debiased machine learning (DML) (Chernozhukov et al., 2018) for panel data in the presence of unobserved heterogeneity. This adaptation is challenging because DML's cross-fitting proc"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2409.01266","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2409.01266/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2409.01266","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:26.919733+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2409.01266v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:26.919733+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2409.01266","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:26.919733+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"U4TAMYFRW2LA","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:26.919733+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6O","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:26.919733+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"U4TAMYFR","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:26.919733+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.29456","citing_title":"Analytical and Bootstrap Confidence Intervals of Double Machine Learning: Simulation studies and an application to rural-urban difference in obesity prevalence","ref_index":6,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP","json":"https://pith.science/pith/U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/U4TAMYFR"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/U4TAMYFR","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2409.01266&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/U4TAMYFRW2LA6W6OY2B6OVKWDP/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:26.919733+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:02:26.919733+00:00"}