{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2022:U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B","short_pith_number":"pith:U5EDMTV4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a748364ebcb8c9fe9588b17b134d2cd86badcd5cf52c2461fc74456dc8ba5633","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2210.17029","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Poison Attack and Defense on Deep Source Code Processing Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Ge Li, Huangzhao Zhang, Jia Li, Xing Hu, Xin Xia, Zhi Jin, Zhuo Li","submitted_at":"2022-10-31T03:06:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the software engineering community, deep learning (DL) has recently been applied to many source code processing tasks. Due to the poor interpretability of DL models, their security vulnerabilities require scrutiny. Recently, researchers have identified an emergent security threat, namely poison attack. The attackers aim to inject insidious backdoors into models by poisoning the training data with poison samples. Poisoned models work normally with clean inputs but produce targeted erroneous results with poisoned inputs embedded with triggers. By activating backdoors, attackers can manipulate"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2210.17029","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2022-10-31T03:06:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI"],"title_canon_sha256":"e222edddaa4299ff41a19b56461249c148ce5f79ab7292ea4388a8b79a5fcea1","abstract_canon_sha256":"8229524e2f7120ec86fce64f990c4eefaa41c3591f2913de9165016d27160f23"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T05:11:54.063602Z","signature_b64":"E40+zAwTIH5WstyUisZrfc+KDG3Hfxtjpq60Gw0jOPKeR+01BArqt+b8SHJGg/X+3NHdQfwnt+TQqEXYecr8AA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a748364ebcb8c9fe9588b17b134d2cd86badcd5cf52c2461fc74456dc8ba5633","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T05:11:54.063132Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T05:11:54.063132Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Poison Attack and Defense on Deep Source Code Processing Models","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI"],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Ge Li, Huangzhao Zhang, Jia Li, Xing Hu, Xin Xia, Zhi Jin, Zhuo Li","submitted_at":"2022-10-31T03:06:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"In the software engineering community, deep learning (DL) has recently been applied to many source code processing tasks. Due to the poor interpretability of DL models, their security vulnerabilities require scrutiny. Recently, researchers have identified an emergent security threat, namely poison attack. The attackers aim to inject insidious backdoors into models by poisoning the training data with poison samples. Poisoned models work normally with clean inputs but produce targeted erroneous results with poisoned inputs embedded with triggers. By activating backdoors, attackers can manipulate"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2210.17029","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2210.17029/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2210.17029","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:11:54.063189+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2210.17029v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:11:54.063189+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2210.17029","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:11:54.063189+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"U5EDMTV4XDE7","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:11:54.063189+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"U5EDMTV4XDE75FMI","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:11:54.063189+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"U5EDMTV4","created_at":"2026-07-05T05:11:54.063189+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.09060","citing_title":"ATTAIN: Automated Exploit Failure Analysis through Trace-Driven Diff Analysis","ref_index":31,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B","json":"https://pith.science/pith/U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/U5EDMTV4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/U5EDMTV4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2210.17029&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/U5EDMTV4XDE75FMIWF5RGTJM3B/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T05:11:54.063189+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T05:11:54.063189+00:00"}