{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS","short_pith_number":"pith:U7WXFHUJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a7ed729e89ec48364ab21d277ab3d13486f6c832c27aeeb08a694dc808541d4c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2311.02362","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Decoy Effect in Search Interaction: A Pilot Study","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Jiqun Liu, Nuo Chen, Tetsuya Sakai, Xiao-Ming Wu","submitted_at":"2023-11-04T10:15:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"In recent years, the influence of cognitive effects and biases on users' thinking, behaving, and decision-making has garnered increasing attention in the field of interactive information retrieval. The decoy effect, one of the main empirically confirmed cognitive biases, refers to the shift in preference between two choices when a third option (the decoy) which is inferior to one of the initial choices is introduced. However, it is not clear how the decoy effect influences user interactions with and evaluations on Search Engine Result Pages (SERPs). To bridge this gap, our study seeks to under"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2311.02362","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.IR","submitted_at":"2023-11-04T10:15:10Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.HC"],"title_canon_sha256":"264d8fada57e76f79349bc54c5b51cbe8e208d67dbda1d9db9a7943a9db4d4aa","abstract_canon_sha256":"32052493b6fe9ab548b77fc9082002c389febe75626e53f731793e12b806e5be"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:43.628157Z","signature_b64":"+fqrX1e6yFrOM0PPFBwcBFBB1jWfcFl5q14OMSvj0+9sr19ITPd2WBu26tZ2Lu+KIQI9SJ555sCTYVpEKGuPBQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a7ed729e89ec48364ab21d277ab3d13486f6c832c27aeeb08a694dc808541d4c","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:43.627627Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:43.627627Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Decoy Effect in Search Interaction: A Pilot Study","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.HC"],"primary_cat":"cs.IR","authors_text":"Jiqun Liu, Nuo Chen, Tetsuya Sakai, Xiao-Ming Wu","submitted_at":"2023-11-04T10:15:10Z","abstract_excerpt":"In recent years, the influence of cognitive effects and biases on users' thinking, behaving, and decision-making has garnered increasing attention in the field of interactive information retrieval. The decoy effect, one of the main empirically confirmed cognitive biases, refers to the shift in preference between two choices when a third option (the decoy) which is inferior to one of the initial choices is introduced. However, it is not clear how the decoy effect influences user interactions with and evaluations on Search Engine Result Pages (SERPs). To bridge this gap, our study seeks to under"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2311.02362","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2311.02362/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2311.02362","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:43.627696+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2311.02362v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:43.627696+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2311.02362","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:43.627696+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"U7WXFHUJ5RED","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:43.627696+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVS","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:43.627696+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"U7WXFHUJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:43.627696+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2411.15396","citing_title":"The Decoy Dilemma in Online Medical Information Evaluation: A Comparative Study of Credibility Assessments by LLM and Human Judges","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS","json":"https://pith.science/pith/U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/U7WXFHUJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/U7WXFHUJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2311.02362&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/U7WXFHUJ5REDMSVSDUTXVM6RGS/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:43.627696+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:27:43.627696+00:00"}