{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2023:UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W","short_pith_number":"pith:UB4BLKWO","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a07815aace295d9490a1de4a343a54ddb55ec2a3c72631c9886d72231aa5af68","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2304.03911","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Kernel Selection for Gaussian Process in Cosmology: with Approximate Bayesian Computation Rejection and Nested Sampling","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Hao Zhang, Ting-Ting Zhang, Tong-Jie Zhang, Yu-Chen Wang","submitted_at":"2023-04-08T04:57:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Gaussian Process (GP) has gained much attention in cosmology due to its ability to reconstruct cosmological data in a model-independent manner. In this study, we compare two methods for GP kernel selection: Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) Rejection and nested sampling. We analyze three types of data: cosmic Chronometer data (CC), Type Ia Supernovae (SNIa), and Gamma Ray Burst (GRB), using five kernel functions. To evaluate the differences between kernel functions, we assess the strength of evidence using Bayes factors. Our results show that, for ABC Rejection, the Mat\\'ern kernel with $"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2304.03911","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","submitted_at":"2023-04-08T04:57:40Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"a646bac9946ac7db9253f6e406cb93557a2985cca4fe76981553bfb5513c3496","abstract_canon_sha256":"aa25f19924a59fe121de7c9e38a0f2d1de5a9356ecf558552acdc0ca2930d13b"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T06:17:49.792808Z","signature_b64":"/h32y24bPXiP5HCQwSlfjA66Y1qFoR3s6wHBuAMySarRYkjQltSpQPJ5lBL9+WtbLZ3zEVvUInBrQSyHzdtiCw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a07815aace295d9490a1de4a343a54ddb55ec2a3c72631c9886d72231aa5af68","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T06:17:49.792406Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T06:17:49.792406Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Kernel Selection for Gaussian Process in Cosmology: with Approximate Bayesian Computation Rejection and Nested Sampling","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"astro-ph.CO","authors_text":"Hao Zhang, Ting-Ting Zhang, Tong-Jie Zhang, Yu-Chen Wang","submitted_at":"2023-04-08T04:57:40Z","abstract_excerpt":"Gaussian Process (GP) has gained much attention in cosmology due to its ability to reconstruct cosmological data in a model-independent manner. In this study, we compare two methods for GP kernel selection: Approximate Bayesian Computation (ABC) Rejection and nested sampling. We analyze three types of data: cosmic Chronometer data (CC), Type Ia Supernovae (SNIa), and Gamma Ray Burst (GRB), using five kernel functions. To evaluate the differences between kernel functions, we assess the strength of evidence using Bayes factors. Our results show that, for ABC Rejection, the Mat\\'ern kernel with $"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2304.03911","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2304.03911/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2304.03911","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:17:49.792457+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2304.03911v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:17:49.792457+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2304.03911","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:17:49.792457+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UB4BLKWOFFOZ","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:17:49.792457+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:17:49.792457+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UB4BLKWO","created_at":"2026-07-05T06:17:49.792457+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.11625","citing_title":"Comparative Analysis of EMCEE, Gaussian Process, and Masked Autoregressive Flow in Constraining the Hubble Constant Using Cosmic Chronometers Dataset","ref_index":17,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UB4BLKWO"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UB4BLKWO","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2304.03911&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UB4BLKWOFFOZJEFB3ZFDIOSU3W/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T06:17:49.792457+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T06:17:49.792457+00:00"}