{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2014:UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ","short_pith_number":"pith:UCRWPWWW","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a0a367dad6277df9a555c6952136e29e433aedb2b1782967b6666793365afb5f","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1408.4344","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Optimal scaling for the pseudo-marginal random walk Metropolis: insensitivity to the noise generating mechanism","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.CO","authors_text":"Chris Sherlock","submitted_at":"2014-08-19T13:57:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"We examine the optimal scaling and the efficiency of the pseudo-marginal random walk Metropolis algorithm using a recently-derived result on the limiting efficiency as the dimension, $d\\rightarrow \\infty$. We prove that the optimal scaling for a given target varies by less than $20\\%$ across a wide range of distributions for the noise in the estimate of the target, and that any scaling that is within $20\\%$ of the optimal one will be at least $70\\%$ efficient. We demonstrate that this phenomenon occurs even outside the range of distributions for which we rigorously prove it. We then conduct a "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1408.4344","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.CO","submitted_at":"2014-08-19T13:57:18Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"f19f695f1c178e0f1ce35f85b7e376f185657f7b9c69f9654a9ff37d964fad04","abstract_canon_sha256":"9ace1ada9e33f6a277f9077a05364f3dd99d34e454af8ab506a2a525abbdb5ce"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T02:18:04.165020Z","signature_b64":"p67VPR11i+pSftAZCjQviuM+HHyTP2j0Vvzi6VRoXG0s9Q5EZBra/XC6HDqzv3L/h8569xr+zJkQNNRKlIYdBw==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a0a367dad6277df9a555c6952136e29e433aedb2b1782967b6666793365afb5f","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T02:18:04.164347Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T02:18:04.164347Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Optimal scaling for the pseudo-marginal random walk Metropolis: insensitivity to the noise generating mechanism","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"stat.CO","authors_text":"Chris Sherlock","submitted_at":"2014-08-19T13:57:18Z","abstract_excerpt":"We examine the optimal scaling and the efficiency of the pseudo-marginal random walk Metropolis algorithm using a recently-derived result on the limiting efficiency as the dimension, $d\\rightarrow \\infty$. We prove that the optimal scaling for a given target varies by less than $20\\%$ across a wide range of distributions for the noise in the estimate of the target, and that any scaling that is within $20\\%$ of the optimal one will be at least $70\\%$ efficient. We demonstrate that this phenomenon occurs even outside the range of distributions for which we rigorously prove it. We then conduct a "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1408.4344","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1408.4344","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:18:04.164452+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1408.4344v3","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:18:04.164452+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1408.4344","created_at":"2026-05-18T02:18:04.164452+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UCRWPWWWE567","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:52.271510+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UCRWPWWWE567TJKV","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:52.271510+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UCRWPWWW","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:28:52.271510+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2502.08157","citing_title":"Bring the noise: exact inference from noisy simulations in collider physics","ref_index":27,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UCRWPWWW"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UCRWPWWW","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1408.4344&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UCRWPWWWE567TJKVY2KSCNXCTZ/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T02:18:04.164452+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T02:18:04.164452+00:00"}