{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2","short_pith_number":"pith:UCTNJC3R","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a0a6d48b7127184a565cda8490bdbcceb4853211235938aa962f9ff3ec277d79","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2407.06798","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"It Cannot Be Right If It Was Written by AI: On Lawyers' Preferences of Documents Perceived as Authored by an LLM vs a Human","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Jakub Harasta, Jaromir Savelka, Tereza Novotn\\'a","submitted_at":"2024-07-09T12:11:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) enable a future in which certain types of legal documents may be generated automatically. This has a great potential to streamline legal processes, lower the cost of legal services, and dramatically increase access to justice. While many researchers focus on proposing and evaluating LLM-based applications supporting tasks in the legal domain, there is a notable lack of investigations into how legal professionals perceive content if they believe an LLM has generated it. Yet, this is a critical point as over-reliance or unfounded scepticism may influence whether such"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2407.06798","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2024-07-09T12:11:25Z","cross_cats_sorted":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"title_canon_sha256":"d77be63908888e622a93bdb921b27b28e56c82a7333451cc4822190f8c7f29f2","abstract_canon_sha256":"a9ea266b8f9d6e441e36c2a272d196c85ace3c9b8c6c90b5982f1d96d3bf29da"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:28.076402Z","signature_b64":"TeBR8eJ1tFsWcqBJqCPypUfybpWLcNMpOjrf2jwbYROn28d2phZnST9shSotG7uZ8FnLfjE9R4CNSsVLQPVZBg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a0a6d48b7127184a565cda8490bdbcceb4853211235938aa962f9ff3ec277d79","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:28.075910Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:28.075910Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"It Cannot Be Right If It Was Written by AI: On Lawyers' Preferences of Documents Perceived as Authored by an LLM vs a Human","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["cs.AI","cs.CY"],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Jakub Harasta, Jaromir Savelka, Tereza Novotn\\'a","submitted_at":"2024-07-09T12:11:25Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models (LLMs) enable a future in which certain types of legal documents may be generated automatically. This has a great potential to streamline legal processes, lower the cost of legal services, and dramatically increase access to justice. While many researchers focus on proposing and evaluating LLM-based applications supporting tasks in the legal domain, there is a notable lack of investigations into how legal professionals perceive content if they believe an LLM has generated it. Yet, this is a critical point as over-reliance or unfounded scepticism may influence whether such"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2407.06798","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2407.06798/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2407.06798","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:28.075962+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2407.06798v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:28.075962+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.06798","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:28.075962+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UCTNJC3RE4ME","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:28.075962+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS4","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:28.075962+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UCTNJC3R","created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:28.075962+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.29598","citing_title":"Spreading the Risk of Scalable Legal Services: The Role of Insurance in Expanding Access to Justice","ref_index":19,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2512.05929","citing_title":"LLM Harms: A Taxonomy and Discussion","ref_index":183,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UCTNJC3R"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UCTNJC3R","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2407.06798&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UCTNJC3RE4MEUVS43KCJBPN4Z2/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:28.075962+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T09:18:28.075962+00:00"}