{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV","short_pith_number":"pith:UDUTRFJJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a0e9389529523a86ad4b46be9b6f4cad53763c91c3f5cca06efd8796034abb10","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2405.04382","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Large Language Models Cannot Explain Themselves","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Advait Sarkar","submitted_at":"2024-05-07T15:05:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models can be prompted to produce text. They can also be prompted to produce \"explanations\" of their output. But these are not really explanations, because they do not accurately reflect the mechanical process underlying the prediction. The illusion that they reflect the reasoning process can result in significant harms. These \"explanations\" can be valuable, but for promoting critical thinking rather than for understanding the model. I propose a recontextualisation of these \"explanations\", using the term \"exoplanations\" to draw attention to their exogenous nature. I discuss some"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2405.04382","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"cs.HC","submitted_at":"2024-05-07T15:05:23Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"f00f05e8118e5e88683ec5e7285a681ace78581ee21741f962c1e9e2e6435b4a","abstract_canon_sha256":"9e708a335b7e1ea179511f42a871076f5675f886912e64ccd39da0b2104c9bbe"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:16:36.320176Z","signature_b64":"0DqH3Fd42oI7nQ/iJksj3HAmhv0XjrxpqBm2FrJS8Dmss5zKUZDApe5aVS1+HUTU9c5Kf5s2FPFa3RX9ooMjDA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a0e9389529523a86ad4b46be9b6f4cad53763c91c3f5cca06efd8796034abb10","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:16:36.319614Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:16:36.319614Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Large Language Models Cannot Explain Themselves","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.HC","authors_text":"Advait Sarkar","submitted_at":"2024-05-07T15:05:23Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large language models can be prompted to produce text. They can also be prompted to produce \"explanations\" of their output. But these are not really explanations, because they do not accurately reflect the mechanical process underlying the prediction. The illusion that they reflect the reasoning process can result in significant harms. These \"explanations\" can be valuable, but for promoting critical thinking rather than for understanding the model. I propose a recontextualisation of these \"explanations\", using the term \"exoplanations\" to draw attention to their exogenous nature. I discuss some"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2405.04382","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2405.04382/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2405.04382","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:16:36.319681+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2405.04382v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:16:36.319681+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2405.04382","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:16:36.319681+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UDUTRFJJKI5I","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:16:36.319681+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UDUTRFJJKI5INLKL","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:16:36.319681+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UDUTRFJJ","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:16:36.319681+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":4,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.11445","citing_title":"Forecasting Future Behavior as a Learning Task","ref_index":72,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2606.06702","citing_title":"Adversarial Co-Thinking: Calibration and Triangulation Across Multiple GenAI Tools in HCI Writing","ref_index":12,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2511.17069","citing_title":"Interpretability from the Ground Up: Stakeholder-Centric Design of Automated Scoring in Educational Assessments","ref_index":45,"is_internal_anchor":false},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.08082","citing_title":"From Binary Groundedness to Support Relations: Towards a Reader-Centred Taxonomy for Comprehension of AI Output","ref_index":38,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UDUTRFJJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UDUTRFJJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2405.04382&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UDUTRFJJKI5INLKLI27JW32MVV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:16:36.319681+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:16:36.319681+00:00"}