{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE","short_pith_number":"pith:UDYMZL6F","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a0f0ccafc506a0bb6d9ad7eac2def3891d9eff4a27a91448961cbb07c8ef03a2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2407.07596","version":2},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Learning treatment effects while treating those in need","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Bryan Wilder, Pim Welle","submitted_at":"2024-07-10T12:29:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"Many social programs attempt to allocate scarce resources to people with the greatest need. Indeed, public services increasingly use algorithmic risk assessments motivated by this goal. However, targeting the highest-need recipients often conflicts with attempting to evaluate the causal effect of the program as a whole, as the best evaluations would be obtained by randomizing the allocation. We propose a framework to design randomized allocation rules which optimally balance targeting high-need individuals with learning treatment effects, presenting policymakers with a Pareto frontier between "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2407.07596","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LG","submitted_at":"2024-07-10T12:29:46Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ME","stat.ML"],"title_canon_sha256":"1ec4f8f0b2b687d2e8889a0827624fc247b81932e35078a9d53989e6d250e33f","abstract_canon_sha256":"dd6fa2cf0c5e620eee200f6adfc1d1c455681bab322e03aaab452dbc28f7f5f2"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:49.285332Z","signature_b64":"X2isutNPs5shQXaBO3sJXfIazLPrYVkIBzzsEXuw8p/WnSej/vdwZtbc/AcRYQliDVt6RX5ouQruKE0ES+0nDg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a0f0ccafc506a0bb6d9ad7eac2def3891d9eff4a27a91448961cbb07c8ef03a2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:49.284836Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:49.284836Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Learning treatment effects while treating those in need","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME","stat.ML"],"primary_cat":"cs.LG","authors_text":"Bryan Wilder, Pim Welle","submitted_at":"2024-07-10T12:29:46Z","abstract_excerpt":"Many social programs attempt to allocate scarce resources to people with the greatest need. Indeed, public services increasingly use algorithmic risk assessments motivated by this goal. However, targeting the highest-need recipients often conflicts with attempting to evaluate the causal effect of the program as a whole, as the best evaluations would be obtained by randomizing the allocation. We propose a framework to design randomized allocation rules which optimally balance targeting high-need individuals with learning treatment effects, presenting policymakers with a Pareto frontier between "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2407.07596","kind":"arxiv","version":2},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2407.07596/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2407.07596","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:49.284901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2407.07596v2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:49.284901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2407.07596","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:49.284901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UDYMZL6FA2QL","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:49.284901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M2","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:49.284901+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UDYMZL6F","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:49.284901+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2506.12677","citing_title":"Dependent Randomized Rounding for Budget Constrained Experimental Design","ref_index":24,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UDYMZL6F"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UDYMZL6F","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2407.07596&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UDYMZL6FA2QLW3M227VMFXXTRE/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:49.284901+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:27:49.284901+00:00"}