{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU","short_pith_number":"pith:UEE3XUTJ","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a109bbd26912d3ae2403e539242a381d02cb1e7dcfe130f52d2dbbfcddbda65d","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2605.15144","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Guises and Perspectives: An Intentional and Hyperintensional Sketch","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Guises act as primary semantic objects showing relations to be internal perspectives rather than external links.","cross_cats":["math.HO","math.LO"],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Juan J. Colomina-Alminana","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T17:47:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper develops a formal logic for guises based on the work of H\\'ector-Neri Casta\\~neda, who understood relations from an internalist viewpoint, following Leibniz. We introduce a syntax, model theory, and proof theory for an intensional logic in which guises (taken as bundles of properties equipped with intention) serve as primary semantic objects. The system integrates (i) a Leibnizian containment semantics for singular truths, (ii) an intentional operator that captures internal relations among guises, and (iii) a modal layer for possibility and necessity modeled as maximally consistent "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":true,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2605.15144","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.LO","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T17:47:52Z","cross_cats_sorted":["math.HO","math.LO"],"title_canon_sha256":"2576c6ed8010e1d956de63427df859e5e64d7b1ace055cb46f4567e4c40804e9","abstract_canon_sha256":"fe28f7442a7c768c7757b64bc72f09a8d51f290d470bd04222025d1b69ad5556"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.2","canonical_sha256":"a109bbd26912d3ae2403e539242a381d02cb1e7dcfe130f52d2dbbfcddbda65d","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-17T21:57:18.856399Z","signature_status":"unsigned_v0","first_computed_at":"2026-05-17T21:40:25.536628Z"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Guises and Perspectives: An Intentional and Hyperintensional Sketch","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"Guises act as primary semantic objects showing relations to be internal perspectives rather than external links.","cross_cats":["math.HO","math.LO"],"primary_cat":"cs.LO","authors_text":"Juan J. Colomina-Alminana","submitted_at":"2026-05-14T17:47:52Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper develops a formal logic for guises based on the work of H\\'ector-Neri Casta\\~neda, who understood relations from an internalist viewpoint, following Leibniz. We introduce a syntax, model theory, and proof theory for an intensional logic in which guises (taken as bundles of properties equipped with intention) serve as primary semantic objects. The system integrates (i) a Leibnizian containment semantics for singular truths, (ii) an intentional operator that captures internal relations among guises, and (iii) a modal layer for possibility and necessity modeled as maximally consistent "},"claims":{"count":4,"items":[{"kind":"strongest_claim","text":"The result is a selfcontained formal framework that demonstrates that relations are not external causal links but intentional internal structures encoded in the guises through which agents and objects are conceived: i.e., they are perspectives.","source":"verdict.strongest_claim","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C1","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"weakest_assumption","text":"That guises can serve as primary semantic objects and that the proposed integration of Leibnizian containment semantics, the intentional operator, and modal closures produces a consistent system supporting the claimed metatheoretic results such as soundness and completeness.","source":"verdict.weakest_assumption","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C2","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"one_line_summary","text":"Develops a new intensional logic system in which guises serve as primary objects to represent relations as intentional internal structures rather than external links.","source":"verdict.one_line_summary","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C3","attestation":"unclaimed"},{"kind":"headline","text":"Guises act as primary semantic objects showing relations to be internal perspectives rather than external links.","source":"verdict.pith_extraction.headline","status":"machine_extracted","claim_id":"C4","attestation":"unclaimed"}],"snapshot_sha256":"090a7d53f3a7e785a7c0251af35445e994d7be3bbd1b4b01d87704d66b035b7e"},"source":{"id":"2605.15144","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":"edb61214-efff-4805-b0c9-416810fb0249","model_set":{"reader":"grok-4.3"},"created_at":"2026-05-15T02:50:36.032863Z","strongest_claim":"The result is a selfcontained formal framework that demonstrates that relations are not external causal links but intentional internal structures encoded in the guises through which agents and objects are conceived: i.e., they are perspectives.","one_line_summary":"Develops a new intensional logic system in which guises serve as primary objects to represent relations as intentional internal structures rather than external links.","pipeline_version":"pith-pipeline@v0.9.0","weakest_assumption":"That guises can serve as primary semantic objects and that the proposed integration of Leibnizian containment semantics, the intentional operator, and modal closures produces a consistent system supporting the claimed metatheoretic results such as soundness and completeness.","pith_extraction_headline":"Guises act as primary semantic objects showing relations to be internal perspectives rather than external links."},"references":{"count":15,"sample":[{"doi":"","year":1983,"title":"Barwise, Jon, and John Perry. 1983. Situations and Attitudes. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 11 Notice that {b} ⊆ κ({b}) and {b} ⊆ {a} is not possible. Therefore, R({b}, {a}) fails. Nevertheless, realize t","work_id":"0f0f58f5-4040-47bc-86ac-6751f5725816","ref_index":1,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":1982,"title":"Bealer, George. 1982. Quality and Concept. Oxford: Clarendon Press","work_id":"ecb505e0-a608-4b60-b9f2-e81b24c14ffe","ref_index":2,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2001,"title":"He: A Study in the Logic of Self‑Consciousness","work_id":"d9b819ac-5b01-4814-ab9e-826ef7293f10","ref_index":3,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2012,"title":"Guide to Ground","work_id":"3e056d43-d470-4212-9d70-9bfa9d7651b1","ref_index":4,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false},{"doi":"","year":2017,"title":"Truth-maker Semantics","work_id":"87037782-df08-4ca3-8b79-a16437206235","ref_index":5,"cited_arxiv_id":"","is_internal_anchor":false}],"resolved_work":15,"snapshot_sha256":"502fcf7e6677e83332dd9f68419b2414c29bf3aaf7a92f22c67957315c64adf1","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2605.15144","created_at":"2026-05-17T21:18:33.147803+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2605.15144v1","created_at":"2026-05-17T21:18:33.147803+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UEE3XUTJCLJ2","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UEE3XUTJ","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:33:37.589309+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":0,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UEE3XUTJ"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UEE3XUTJ","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2605.15144&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UEE3XUTJCLJ24JAD4U4SIKRYDU/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-17T21:18:33.147803+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-17T21:57:18.856490+00:00"}