{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV","short_pith_number":"pith:UG6CINO4","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a1bc2435dc46dac25e9fff1825170b2d47899bcfcf5122f8b0cee1638d5bd044","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2507.07682","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Prompt Engineering for Requirements Engineering: A Literature Review and Roadmap","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Chetan Arora, Fanyu Wang, Kaicheng Huang, Yutan Huang","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T12:02:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Advancements in large language models (LLMs) have led to a surge of prompt engineering (PE) techniques that can enhance various requirements engineering (RE) tasks. However, current LLMs are often characterized by significant uncertainty and a lack of controllability. This absence of clear guidance on how to effectively prompt LLMs acts as a barrier to their trustworthy implementation in the RE field. We present the first roadmap-oriented systematic literature review of Prompt Engineering for RE (PE4RE). Following Kitchenham's and Petersen's secondary-study protocol, we searched six digital li"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2507.07682","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.SE","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T12:02:56Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"746fc2453eecd39ecc8461a732f7f1948815e584c1bc6cd7e880207d60800fe3","abstract_canon_sha256":"b3b3a490a0879625a821946aa10b535c7eea4f6bfc062ecaf05606266407df22"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:02.979198Z","signature_b64":"iQ5ZvardOcdM1bo/zdQQXluYsXuU8YX5dJ0nTR/vn/3KL+NTobIf5sLN/rc8IrbckiWf+wxMwfCmsnsgcJV6Bg==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a1bc2435dc46dac25e9fff1825170b2d47899bcfcf5122f8b0cee1638d5bd044","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:02.978710Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:02.978710Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Prompt Engineering for Requirements Engineering: A Literature Review and Roadmap","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.SE","authors_text":"Chetan Arora, Fanyu Wang, Kaicheng Huang, Yutan Huang","submitted_at":"2025-07-10T12:02:56Z","abstract_excerpt":"Advancements in large language models (LLMs) have led to a surge of prompt engineering (PE) techniques that can enhance various requirements engineering (RE) tasks. However, current LLMs are often characterized by significant uncertainty and a lack of controllability. This absence of clear guidance on how to effectively prompt LLMs acts as a barrier to their trustworthy implementation in the RE field. We present the first roadmap-oriented systematic literature review of Prompt Engineering for RE (PE4RE). Following Kitchenham's and Petersen's secondary-study protocol, we searched six digital li"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2507.07682","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2507.07682/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2507.07682","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:02.978770+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2507.07682v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:02.978770+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2507.07682","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:02.978770+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UG6CINO4I3NM","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:02.978770+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UG6CINO4I3NMEXU7","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:02.978770+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UG6CINO4","created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:02.978770+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2607.00427","citing_title":"BT-APE: A Computationally Light Backtracking Approach to Automatic Prompt Engineering for Requirements Classification","ref_index":23,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UG6CINO4"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UG6CINO4","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2507.07682&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UG6CINO4I3NMEXU774MCKFYLFV/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:02.978770+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T11:35:02.978770+00:00"}