{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2026:UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73","short_pith_number":"pith:UHCFNC5U","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a1c4568bb442b2268b7f44ddbd0482fee2a38c6323ddb1323df3120477d9638b","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2602.16733","version":3},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Scaling Reproducibility: An AI-Assisted Workflow for Large-Scale Replication and Reanalysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Leo Yang Yang, Yiqing Xu","submitted_at":"2026-02-17T20:32:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Computational reproducibility is central to scientific credibility, yet verifying published results at scale remains costly. We develop an AI-assisted workflow for automated full-paper replication -- retrieving materials, reconstructing environments, executing code, and matching outputs to point estimates reported in regression tables. We define a universe of all empirical and quantitative papers from the three top political science journals (2010--2025) and measure stated data availability using automated extraction. For a stratified sample of 384 studies, we apply the workflow to conduct ful"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2602.16733","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","primary_cat":"econ.EM","submitted_at":"2026-02-17T20:32:04Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ME"],"title_canon_sha256":"aca60bb36373fecaf24a195b0d18a99c738be76eb96fe5ff7c97a9cc04694996","abstract_canon_sha256":"bef4381231fdcddc143566a6dbdf0323c0fd81dd30b018db0a6ef0371920a734"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.954726Z","signature_b64":"lwHBkmtK+I5MLtVH0QBNa3aGty/p0IRRwXopb1dpJvC35Pn00ltjbv8pQi4JK6aRlV8lO79BV5lhiw0aoIktCQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a1c4568bb442b2268b7f44ddbd0482fee2a38c6323ddb1323df3120477d9638b","last_reissued_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.954201Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.954201Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Scaling Reproducibility: An AI-Assisted Workflow for Large-Scale Replication and Reanalysis","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"econ.EM","authors_text":"Leo Yang Yang, Yiqing Xu","submitted_at":"2026-02-17T20:32:04Z","abstract_excerpt":"Computational reproducibility is central to scientific credibility, yet verifying published results at scale remains costly. We develop an AI-assisted workflow for automated full-paper replication -- retrieving materials, reconstructing environments, executing code, and matching outputs to point estimates reported in regression tables. We define a universe of all empirical and quantitative papers from the three top political science journals (2010--2025) and measure stated data availability using automated extraction. For a stratified sample of 384 studies, we apply the workflow to conduct ful"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2602.16733","kind":"arxiv","version":3},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2602.16733/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2602.16733","created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.954265+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2602.16733v3","created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.954265+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2602.16733","created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.954265+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UHCFNC5UIKZC","created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.954265+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37","created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.954265+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UHCFNC5U","created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.954265+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":2,"internal_anchor_count":2,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.00803","citing_title":"Can Coding Agents Reproduce Findings in Computational Materials Science?","ref_index":13,"is_internal_anchor":true},{"citing_arxiv_id":"2604.21965","citing_title":"Read the Paper, Write the Code: Agentic Reproduction of Social-Science Results","ref_index":2,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UHCFNC5U"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UHCFNC5U","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2602.16733&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UHCFNC5UIKZCNC37ITO32BEC73/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.954265+00:00","updated_at":"2026-06-02T02:04:14.954265+00:00"}