{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2024:UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3","short_pith_number":"pith:UITM27TN","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a226cd7e6dbd96dbf0d4839f77dc4b86c25c387d908f522d1b4b776e996f3db0","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2406.09464","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"GPT-ology, Computational Models, Silicon Sampling: How should we think about LLMs in Cognitive Science?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Desmond C. Ong","submitted_at":"2024-06-13T04:19:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models have taken the cognitive science world by storm. It is perhaps timely now to take stock of the various research paradigms that have been used to make scientific inferences about ``cognition\" in these models or about human cognition. We review several emerging research paradigms -- GPT-ology, LLMs-as-computational-models, and ``silicon sampling\" -- and review recent papers that have used LLMs under these paradigms. In doing so, we discuss their claims as well as challenges to scientific inference under these various paradigms. We highlight several outstanding issues about "},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2406.09464","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.AI","submitted_at":"2024-06-13T04:19:17Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"0cb98d7113c5b8a0720799706d5a2cd4b45653a0f417bc8fb366c774ee08e52c","abstract_canon_sha256":"afb65712976afd19f2cd3d20decbd6507bc8df7c7fd46f890293532d4956e897"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T08:31:54.419872Z","signature_b64":"9RaTmmUL7KSI/EtPkLh/vuc22CytDLVoh6W1l+tXiQT+rlQ8gZW3CpZmGwYzXaE897JGfiUpQReLisX/14elAA==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a226cd7e6dbd96dbf0d4839f77dc4b86c25c387d908f522d1b4b776e996f3db0","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T08:31:54.419458Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T08:31:54.419458Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"GPT-ology, Computational Models, Silicon Sampling: How should we think about LLMs in Cognitive Science?","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.AI","authors_text":"Desmond C. Ong","submitted_at":"2024-06-13T04:19:17Z","abstract_excerpt":"Large Language Models have taken the cognitive science world by storm. It is perhaps timely now to take stock of the various research paradigms that have been used to make scientific inferences about ``cognition\" in these models or about human cognition. We review several emerging research paradigms -- GPT-ology, LLMs-as-computational-models, and ``silicon sampling\" -- and review recent papers that have used LLMs under these paradigms. In doing so, we discuss their claims as well as challenges to scientific inference under these various paradigms. We highlight several outstanding issues about "},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2406.09464","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2406.09464/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2406.09464","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:31:54.419516+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2406.09464v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:31:54.419516+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2406.09464","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:31:54.419516+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UITM27TNXWLN","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:31:54.419516+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UITM27TNXWLNX4GU","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:31:54.419516+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UITM27TN","created_at":"2026-07-05T08:31:54.419516+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2501.12651","citing_title":"The potential -- and the pitfalls -- of using pre-trained language models as cognitive science theories","ref_index":66,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UITM27TN"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UITM27TN","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2406.09464&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UITM27TNXWLNX4GUQOPXPXCLQ3/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T08:31:54.419516+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T08:31:54.419516+00:00"}