{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2025:UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G","short_pith_number":"pith:UIXIH4I2","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a22e83f11a752a2d0f6b3e4f673334e9957fb403ea40fdb1c9ebf4f21a34a0d2","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"2502.15725","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Town Hall Debate Prompting: Enhancing Logical Reasoning in LLMs through Multi-Persona Interaction","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bhav Jain, Ishaan Garg, Kevin Zhu, Michael Lam, Rishan Thangaraj, Vivaan Sandwar","submitted_at":"2025-01-28T11:58:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Debate is a commonly used form of human communication catered towards problem-solving because of its efficiency. Debate fundamentally allows multiple viewpoints to be brought up in problem-solving, and for complex problems, each viewpoint opens a new path for problem-solving. In this work, we apply this concept to LLM decision-making by proposing town hall-style debate prompting (THDP), a prompting method that splices a language model into multiple personas that will debate one another to reach a conclusion. Our experimental pipeline varies both the number of personas and the personality types"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"2502.15725","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","primary_cat":"cs.CL","submitted_at":"2025-01-28T11:58:09Z","cross_cats_sorted":[],"title_canon_sha256":"8525ba23886a993d865d333f3357e24d98a130727563de729325b7e38917b9f3","abstract_canon_sha256":"6537b2d22b789eb567a0ad81fa10301cee5f7ae169dd6ff1eb35e980ae2d44d1"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:15.473492Z","signature_b64":"P7YiF6X6HKp0ceP3VRvRo+jpTKZ7/z8q13EYRHoX9ZYNpnjOCLh3IXbHgOO5eaVIMMpTgQGYgN72Nb1ykvcCAQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a22e83f11a752a2d0f6b3e4f673334e9957fb403ea40fdb1c9ebf4f21a34a0d2","last_reissued_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:15.473058Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:15.473058Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Town Hall Debate Prompting: Enhancing Logical Reasoning in LLMs through Multi-Persona Interaction","license":"http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":[],"primary_cat":"cs.CL","authors_text":"Bhav Jain, Ishaan Garg, Kevin Zhu, Michael Lam, Rishan Thangaraj, Vivaan Sandwar","submitted_at":"2025-01-28T11:58:09Z","abstract_excerpt":"Debate is a commonly used form of human communication catered towards problem-solving because of its efficiency. Debate fundamentally allows multiple viewpoints to be brought up in problem-solving, and for complex problems, each viewpoint opens a new path for problem-solving. In this work, we apply this concept to LLM decision-making by proposing town hall-style debate prompting (THDP), a prompting method that splices a language model into multiple personas that will debate one another to reach a conclusion. Our experimental pipeline varies both the number of personas and the personality types"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"2502.15725","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"integrity":{"clean":true,"summary":{"advisory":0,"critical":0,"by_detector":{},"informational":0},"endpoint":"/pith/2502.15725/integrity.json","findings":[],"available":true,"detectors_run":[],"snapshot_sha256":"c28c3603d3b5d939e8dc4c7e95fa8dfce3d595e45f758748cecf8e644a296938"},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"2502.15725","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:15.473112+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"2502.15725v1","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:15.473112+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.2502.15725","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:15.473112+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UIXIH4I2OUVC","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:15.473112+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3L","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:15.473112+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UIXIH4I2","created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:15.473112+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":0,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2510.07517","citing_title":"When Identity Skews Debate: Anonymization for Bias-Reduced Multi-Agent Reasoning","ref_index":71,"is_internal_anchor":false}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UIXIH4I2"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UIXIH4I2","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=2502.15725&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UIXIH4I2OUVC2D3LHZHWOMZU5G/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:15.473112+00:00","updated_at":"2026-07-05T10:18:15.473112+00:00"}