{"record_type":"pith_number_record","schema_url":"https://pith.science/schemas/pith-number/v1.json","pith_number":"pith:2011:UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI","short_pith_number":"pith:UQIXV22E","schema_version":"1.0","canonical_sha256":"a4117aeb442f31fbfc76bb99a7184f9a33437a0103424855e618b38f6610d28c","source":{"kind":"arxiv","id":"1106.4431","version":1},"attestation_state":"computed","paper":{"title":"Gaussian Process Regression with a Student-t Likelihood","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Aki Vehtari, Jarno Vanhatalo, Pasi Jyl\\\"anki","submitted_at":"2011-06-22T12:24:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper considers the robust and efficient implementation of Gaussian process regression with a Student-t observation model. The challenge with the Student-t model is the analytically intractable inference which is why several approximative methods have been proposed. The expectation propagation (EP) has been found to be a very accurate method in many empirical studies but the convergence of the EP is known to be problematic with models containing non-log-concave site functions such as the Student-t distribution. In this paper we illustrate the situations where the standard EP fails to conv"},"verification_status":{"content_addressed":true,"pith_receipt":true,"author_attested":false,"weak_author_claims":0,"strong_author_claims":0,"externally_anchored":false,"storage_verified":false,"citation_signatures":0,"replication_records":0,"graph_snapshot":true,"references_resolved":false,"formal_links_present":false},"canonical_record":{"source":{"id":"1106.4431","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"metadata":{"license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","primary_cat":"stat.ML","submitted_at":"2011-06-22T12:24:03Z","cross_cats_sorted":["stat.ME"],"title_canon_sha256":"aeec48d46a19f923984d2f0d632ee236260cac4e21ab4e52219329dac63603d8","abstract_canon_sha256":"557a1ca720f8a844cbcf866f281fc649362c8effb88ab968a64b8d13e22d866c"},"schema_version":"1.0"},"receipt":{"kind":"pith_receipt","key_id":"pith-v1-2026-05","algorithm":"ed25519","signed_at":"2026-05-18T03:52:28.423366Z","signature_b64":"49g7pciOk4YyNIbz9Bj+MvpYiOOzH1RqHrFIpaaWwR1sRatC6nMdO54DBYAwaZsZcFd5Tv2MXq/a83EI+x4+BQ==","signed_message":"canonical_sha256_bytes","builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1","receipt_version":"0.3","canonical_sha256":"a4117aeb442f31fbfc76bb99a7184f9a33437a0103424855e618b38f6610d28c","last_reissued_at":"2026-05-18T03:52:28.422567Z","signature_status":"signed_v1","first_computed_at":"2026-05-18T03:52:28.422567Z","public_key_fingerprint":"8d4b5ee74e4693bcd1df2446408b0d54"},"graph_snapshot":{"paper":{"title":"Gaussian Process Regression with a Student-t Likelihood","license":"http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/","headline":"","cross_cats":["stat.ME"],"primary_cat":"stat.ML","authors_text":"Aki Vehtari, Jarno Vanhatalo, Pasi Jyl\\\"anki","submitted_at":"2011-06-22T12:24:03Z","abstract_excerpt":"This paper considers the robust and efficient implementation of Gaussian process regression with a Student-t observation model. The challenge with the Student-t model is the analytically intractable inference which is why several approximative methods have been proposed. The expectation propagation (EP) has been found to be a very accurate method in many empirical studies but the convergence of the EP is known to be problematic with models containing non-log-concave site functions such as the Student-t distribution. In this paper we illustrate the situations where the standard EP fails to conv"},"claims":{"count":0,"items":[],"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"source":{"id":"1106.4431","kind":"arxiv","version":1},"verdict":{"id":null,"model_set":{},"created_at":null,"strongest_claim":"","one_line_summary":"","pipeline_version":null,"weakest_assumption":"","pith_extraction_headline":""},"references":{"count":0,"sample":[],"resolved_work":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57","internal_anchors":0},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"author_claims":{"count":0,"strong_count":0,"snapshot_sha256":"258153158e38e3291e3d48162225fcdb2d5a3ed65a07baac614ab91432fd4f57"},"builder_version":"pith-number-builder-2026-05-17-v1"},"aliases":[{"alias_kind":"arxiv","alias_value":"1106.4431","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:52:28.422696+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"arxiv_version","alias_value":"1106.4431v1","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:52:28.422696+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"doi","alias_value":"10.48550/arxiv.1106.4431","created_at":"2026-05-18T03:52:28.422696+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_12","alias_value":"UQIXV22EF4Y7","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:42.757692+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_16","alias_value":"UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DW","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:42.757692+00:00"},{"alias_kind":"pith_short_8","alias_value":"UQIXV22E","created_at":"2026-05-18T12:26:42.757692+00:00"}],"events":[],"event_summary":{},"paper_claims":[],"inbound_citations":{"count":1,"internal_anchor_count":1,"sample":[{"citing_arxiv_id":"2605.13427","citing_title":"Latent-Space Gaussian Processes for Dark-Energy Reconstruction from Observational \\(H(z)\\) Data","ref_index":87,"is_internal_anchor":true}]},"formal_canon":{"evidence_count":0,"sample":[],"anchors":[]},"links":{"html":"https://pith.science/pith/UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI","json":"https://pith.science/pith/UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI.json","graph_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI/graph.json","events_json":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI/events.json","paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UQIXV22E"},"agent_actions":{"view_html":"https://pith.science/pith/UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI","download_json":"https://pith.science/pith/UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI.json","view_paper":"https://pith.science/paper/UQIXV22E","resolve_alias":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/resolve?arxiv=1106.4431&json=true","fetch_graph":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI/graph.json","fetch_events":"https://pith.science/api/pith-number/UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI/events.json","actions":{"anchor_timestamp":"https://pith.science/pith/UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI/action/timestamp_anchor","attest_storage":"https://pith.science/pith/UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI/action/storage_attestation","attest_author":"https://pith.science/pith/UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI/action/author_attestation","sign_citation":"https://pith.science/pith/UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI/action/citation_signature","submit_replication":"https://pith.science/pith/UQIXV22EF4Y7X7DWXOM2OGCPTI/action/replication_record"}},"created_at":"2026-05-18T03:52:28.422696+00:00","updated_at":"2026-05-18T03:52:28.422696+00:00"}